Is A Reasonable Effort At Democracy Enough?

from the it's-a-sort-of-democratic-election dept

While other states are being more proactive about stopping bad e-voting machines, Maryland has decided it's just too much effort to, you know, make sure democracy works right. A judge there has decided that, you know what, the folks in Maryland have tried pretty hard on this whole thing, and even if the machines don't really work right and are opening to tampering, it's the thought that counts. Because they've made a "reasonable effort" to ensure the machines are safe, they can be used. Why should the "effort" matter, rather than the actual state of the machines? While it's true that other methods also have their problems, that doesn't mean that the current machines should be given a pass for being "good enough." There are clear ways to improve them and make them even less prone to mistakes or fraud, and there's no reason not to do so.

3 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    evoting

    icon
    d blevins (profile), Sep 3rd, 2004 @ 10:27am

    "Do not confuse effort with results"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    effort=less

    identicon
    Jeremiah, Sep 3rd, 2004 @ 11:53am

    I wonder if the "reasonable effort" standard could be applied in other cases...say......P2P. As in: "The court finds eDonkey to have made a reasonable effort to ensure their products are not used in a way harmful to copyright holders. Mr. Valenti, you may now go to hell."

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Actually not a bad ruling

    identicon
    John D., Sep 6th, 2004 @ 4:53pm

    "There are clear ways to improve them and make them even less prone to mistakes or fraud, and there's no reason not to do so."
    In this context, there are reasons not to do so. The general election is 2 months away and changing things now would be completely irresponsible. The voting system Md bought is far from perfect but this actually was a good ruling from a judge who understood 1) that it takes a lot of preparation to run an election and 2) that election officials *are* committed to a fair election (to put things simply). The fact that they have to work with an inferior system is largely not their fault and I know from direct experience that they do everything they can to ensure that everything goes well.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This