Watch Jack Valenti Try To Rewrite History

from the nice-try,-Jack dept

News.com is running an interview with Jack Valenti where they actually ask him the question that many interviewers have skipped over, about his famous "Boston strangler" quote about how the VCR will kill the movie industry. Valenti, in his usual manner, tries to rewrite history by making two claims. First, he says he was never actually against the VCR, but was just worried about the piracy aspect. Second, he says he's been vindicated in those views because of all the VCR related piracy that's out there. He's wrong on both points, but the News.com interviewer doesn't challenge him. First, it's pretty clear that if you say that the VCR is the Boston Strangler to the film producer, that you expect it to kill off the film industry. Instead, the VCR completely revived and revitalized the industry. Second, his claim on vindication is because of incredibly misleading stats that he throws out (twice!) claiming that the industry is "losing" $3.5 billion a year to piracy -- not considering the fact that the vast majority of people who end up with pirated films were unlikely to buy the full cost version. Compare this to another interview today by the Harvard professor who did that study a few months ago suggesting that file sharing does not damage sales. In that interview, the professor admits what the entertainment industry refuses to believe: there are multiple factors related to file sharing that impact entertainment sales. Some of it is as a substitution (people will download instead of buy) and some of it is as a promotion (people will use the free downloadable content to make a decision on what to buy). These two factors can compete. The professor wants to find out what the actual impact of these competing factors will be, while the industry refuses to believe that anyone could possibly use these tools for promotional value. It's a dangerous blindness to reality that doesn't bode well for them.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    NOBODY, Jun 22nd, 2004 @ 3:20pm

    No Subject Given

    Right mike.
    But still, in their defense, it isn't really your place to tell them how they can and can't use their own copyrights. That's just a fact of life.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Mike (profile), Jun 22nd, 2004 @ 7:40pm

      Re: No Subject Given

      I have never told them how they can and can't use their copyrights. From the very beginning I have been clear. My stance on the entertainment industry is that I am trying to *help* them avoid becoming obsolete.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jul 25th, 2004 @ 7:06pm

      Re: No Subject Given

      Whose place is it exactly? Congress, who they pay off? The judges do a good job stopping a lot of this stupidity, but it takes them several years generally..in the mean time, we can at least conduct a little civil protest by complaining online can't we?

      Saying citizens don't have the right to complain about those things they perceive as injustices makes you a brainless moron. The Constitution is there for a reason..and it says we *do* have the right to tell our congressman how to legislate on business issues. So in every way, it IS our place to tell them.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This