It's certainly not a new argument, but the Washington Post is running a very good overview concerning the issues of network neutrality that are constantly being debated. The main issue is whether or not broadband providers should be required by law to be neutral to any services that go across their network - not blocking any particular service or boosting their own offerings. For example, if they wanted, they could slow down Vonage and then promote their own VoIP offering as having higher quality of service. The broadband providers claim, truthfully, that (1) there's no evidence that this has ever happened and (2) that they would be crazy to do so, because the negative publicity associated with doing so would be incredibly damaging, and customers would head to other providers that promise neutrality. Still, the issue could get slightly more complex as broadband providers are offering more advanced services themselves - and can try to optimize their own network for those particular services. In other words, they may not weaken competing services, but may make efforts to make their own services much stronger (which some may say is really the same thing).
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Kansas City Cops Tell Man They'll Kill His Dogs And Destroy His Home If Forced To Obtain A Search Warrant
- Most Big Internet Companies Speak Out For Major Surveillance Reform
- Witness In No Fly List Trial, Who Was Blocked From Flying To The Trial, Shows That DOJ Flat Out Lied In Court
- Feds Insist It Must Be Kept Secret Whether Or Not Plaintiff In No Fly List Trial Is Actually On The No Fly List
- Documents Show LA Sheriff's Department Hired Thieves, Statutory Rapists And Bad Cops