From Resume Spam To Missed Job Opportunities

from the filtering-troubles dept

There have been complaints in the past about resume spam - where people either would randomly email out hundreds of resumes with no sense of targeting, or in response to a single job opening, an HR department would get bombarded with resumes. However, as spam filters become more common, this is leading to a different type of problem: legitimate resumes getting caught in spam filters. Whereas, in the past, people would try to put certain keywords into their resumes so that automated sorting technology would highlight their resumes, now people are trying to avoid certain words to keep their resumes from getting hung up (imagine how difficult it must be for anyone who worked on the product Viagra - a success story by any criteria - to get his or her resume into the hands of a new potential employer). Of course, this actually seems like a case where challenge-response could solve the problem. In announcing a specific job opening, perhaps it makes sense to set up a challenge-response email address for that particular opening. This would also let the company provide additional "are you sure you're appropriate for this job" type of warnings before the applicant submitted their resume.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Resume effectiveness

    identicon
    Joe Baderderm, Apr 13th, 2004 @ 1:15pm

    Of course, 95% of jobs are filled via personal contacts within companies. If you are trying to get the job by e-mailing the HR department, you are already a step behind. I receive e-mail that is sent to the "[email protected]" address and am surprised how many unsolicited resumes come in.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Writer missed the point

    identicon
    Tim, Apr 14th, 2004 @ 12:55pm

    I was one of the people interviewed for the article, and while the writer didn't misrepresent me, I thought he missed the larger point I made in my original post, which was: Email has evolved in a very short period of time (~10 years) to become a critical means of business communication, similar to the rise of the telegraph in the second half of the 1800s. However, the measures being used to combat the rising flood of spam are now threatening email, because they make email unreliable. It used to be that when you sent email, it either got to its destination, or it bounced. Now there is a significant possibility that an email will simply disappear into the black hole of spam filters, with no notification to sender or intended recipient. That's not good enough for business use.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This