It turns out that some spam operation in Texas had been sending out thousands of emails to students at the University of Texas. The IT staff at UT put up a filter that blocked out that spam. All this seems reasonable enough. However, the spammers' confused reading of the law made them believe that based on CAN-SPAM and the First Amendment everyone should be required to receive their emails and it would be against the law to filter them. So, they sued the University of Texas for daring to filter spam. Luckily, a judge has quickly tossed out the case, realizing that just because CAN-SPAM lays down the rules for spamming, it doesn't mean service providers have to deliver the spam to their users. It seems that too many people have confused the First Amendment to believe that everyone must listen to them - and not just that the government can't silence them. There's a very big difference.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Feds To FISC: Of Course We Don't Have To Share Our Full Legal Filings With Companies Suing Us Over NSA Transparency
- Kansas City Cops Tell Man They'll Kill His Dogs And Destroy His Home If Forced To Obtain A Search Warrant
- Most Big Internet Companies Speak Out For Major Surveillance Reform
- Witness In No Fly List Trial, Who Was Blocked From Flying To The Trial, Shows That DOJ Flat Out Lied In Court
- Feds Insist It Must Be Kept Secret Whether Or Not Plaintiff In No Fly List Trial Is Actually On The No Fly List