Making A Living Spamming - Might Be Getting Tougher

from the yeah,-right dept

Because there just haven't been enough "profile of a spammer" articles written by the press already, here's yet another one that goes on and on about how much money all those spammers are making. Why is it that no one ever questions these numbers? Spammers aren't known for being the most trustworthy of sources. However, this article does bring up the issue that for spammers to make money, someone's gotta be buying this stuff (even if many spammers make their money from selling lists - at some point, somewhere, someone's gotta buy for it to all be worthwhile). While we recently had a story on one such guy, you still wonder just how many of those guys there are. The article linked above says that spammers see about an 8% response rate - which sounds ridiculously high to me. Of course, I travel in circles where people tend to know better. However, Ed Felten has a theory that the latest spam stats indicate that people are finally wising up. Fewer people are responding to spam, and fewer people are buying from spam. He's hoping that as internet users get a bit more savvy, those numbers should continue to decrease.

5 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    When will

    identicon
    dorpus, Mar 22nd, 2004 @ 3:37am

    the starving children of the developing world start sending real e-mails about their plight, and pollute the net with spam that is true?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Increase...not decrease

    identicon
    thecaptain, Mar 22nd, 2004 @ 5:25am

    If the response rate goes down (lets say from the stated 8% to 4%) spam will not reduce...it will increase.

    Use the sick logic these morons use, if sending 10 million emails a day netted them 8% in sucker response for a while, then it drops by half...they won't think "awww, well this business sucks now, I'll cut back and do something useful!" they'll think "well if I'm only getting half what i used to, then sending out twice as much will net me the money I want to be making..."

    Hence he'll send out 20 million, even 30 million if he can.

    These people are scum...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    When will dorpus stop sniffing glue ?

    identicon
    antidorpus, Mar 22nd, 2004 @ 7:38am


    ... as soon as you dorpus send them each a wireless laptop & pollute their barren wasteland of Sally Struthersness with hotspots aplenty ...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Re: Increase...not decrease

    identicon
    aNonMooseCowherd, Mar 22nd, 2004 @ 8:16am

    If the response rate goes down (lets say from the stated 8% to 4%) spam will not reduce...it will increase.

    Maybe. The spammers may just start relying more on outdated lists, without knowing or caring that their spam isn't even being delivered.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    aNonMooseCowherd, Mar 22nd, 2004 @ 8:18am

    However, this article does bring up the issue that for spammers to make money, someone's gotta be buying this stuff (even if many spammers make their money from selling lists - at some point, somewhere, someone's gotta buy for it to all be worthwhile).

    Maybe the whole thing is just a big pyramid scheme and no one is really buying anything except spam lists and spam software.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This