RSS
Could Google Results Be Libelous?
from the maybe-possibly... dept
Well, here's a legal challenge: could the results of a Google search be considered libel? A man is suing Google, Yahoo, AOL and Time Warner (all the non-Google sites were using Google at the time - so this is really a Google issue) because a search on his name turned up misleading reports suggesting that he had done various illegal things in his accounting practice. The problem was that he never had done those things. Google, of course, points out that they just search the web and deliver the results, and if there's false info on a page, it's the problem of whoever is hosting the info. This all makes sense - and, in fact, many blogs seem to be reporting this story as if the guy is a complete moron for threatening Google for the results. That's not all there is to this case, though. Where it gets trickier is that the guy claims the page Google pointed to never actually said what Google's results suggest it did. Instead, he claims that Google reformatted the page in a way that makes him look guilty of things he never did. This is the part where I wish the article had a lot more detailed information - since normally Google just links to a page and wouldn't reformat anything. My only guess is that the information was originally in a pdf file, which Google often tries to turn into an HTML file - and that's where the reformatting may have occurred. Otherwise, perhaps the Google cache somehow reformatted the page. Does anyone have any more details on what actually happened? Either way - it does raise a question: if Google's conversion of a file did result in false, damaging information, would they be guilty of libel? Update: Ah! As is pointed out in the comments, the libel claims is most likely based on the way Google puts together snippets from the page to create the "summary" found with the link in it's results. There, it's completely possible that a quick skim would show people something completely out of context. The question remains, however, is that libel? And, if it is, can you blame a computer program for libel?
6 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
- White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
PageRank, or RansomNote
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: PageRank, or RansomNote
The interesting thing is that the problem is completely context sensitive, making it a tough one for Google to do much about without just reducing the quality of the excerpt.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It's probably not libel
I would guess that the Google software doesn't have any true AI behind it and is therefore unable to form malicious intent. I would posit that it also can't be exceedingly reckless as software just takes some public information and snippets it together. For the coders that might be negligent, but certainly not reckless.
Then again, with the courts these days, who knows what they (or a jury) might decide.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's probably not libel
Interesting legal question here- at what point is an AI powerful enough to have to abide by laws?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Kabir Sehgal writes about the Google Wars
http://www.thedartmouth.com/article.php?aid=2004041902010
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Kabir Sehgal writes about the Google Wars
http://www.thedartmouth.com/article.php?aid=2004041902010
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment