RSS
Should Spam Sentences Be Light?
from the well,-relatively... dept
Back in January, the US Sentencing Commission asked for feedback on what sort of punishment convicted spammers should receive. We figured that people would write in with suggestions that included life in prison (while deleting an ever-full spammed in-box, of course), but it appears the opposite has happened. Legal groups wrote in to suggest that spam really isn't that bad - and while there should be some punishment, it shouldn't be as strict as the penalties for outright fraud. While some anti-spammers may get upset by lenient spam sentences - they should also remember just how poorly written CAN-SPAM is, and realize that it may end up putting non-spammers at risk as well. Update: Of course, in the meantime, CAN-SPAM (as expected) has done nothing to stop the flow of spam, and people are getting increasingly fed up with the difficulty of using email, thanks to all the spam they get.
4 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Justice Department Wants $5 Million To Bolster Its Efforts As Hollywood's Private Police Force
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
No Computers
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
depends on what you mean by light.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
But that's not much of a legal theory. The punishment should be proportional to the damage done by the crime, not to the magnitude of our distaste.
The punishment should be very light, but each message sent should be a separate charge. So, if you're convicted of 100,000 counts of spamming, and each count carries a sentence of 15 minutes in jail, that's 2.8 years in jail.
Thus using the economics of spam against them.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I suggest a slap on the wrist.
One slap per spam sent, that is.
But seriously, spamming isn't all that bad when compared to, say, murder or even fraud. It's sort of like littering--if only one or two people do it, there's no real harm done but it's a different story when lots of people do it. What's important is that the law make spamming more trouble than it's worth.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment