RSS
Lots Of Enthusiasm, Not So Much Profit
from the getting-over-that-hurdle dept
I was having a discussion recently with someone about the challenge of selling "TiVo-like" products - by which we didn't mean other PVRs, but products where (a) the product's benefits are difficult to describe but (b) the early adopters who sign on can't imagine living without it. It's a challenge a lot of companies face, and no one seems to have a very good answer. Some people think you just focus in on one differentiating aspect of the technology and pitch it relentlessly. Others try to build up word-of-mouth buzz. Still others try to get as many "trial" users as possible. It really depends on the actual product, but venture capitalist Kevin Laws is looking at these types of companies and wondering what it takes to jump that hurdle. Is it just a question of letting the companies grow slowly, instead of pushing for the mass acceptance right away, or is there something else to it? It seems to me, that the examples he cites of companies that have made it over that hurdle were less revolutionary than those that haven't. That is, while the iPod and the Treo 600 have done things right, both were actually smart updates on previously failed products in that space. The examples he mentions of companies that have struggled (TiVo, PayTrust) are companies that have spent more time trying to invent and define the space themselves. The real question, then, is whether or not companies that create a space can successfully hang on and remain relevant until the market actually takes off. In many cases, I wonder if those companies have trouble because they're so focused on their own product and defining the market that they miss out on the one big feature that catapults a competitor into market dominance.
4 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- New Study From Booz & Co. Shows That SOPA/PROTECT IP Will Chill Investment In Innovation
- Send In The Clones: Startup Raises $90 Million To Copy Other Startup
- DailyDirt: Expensive Things To Buy...
- Are Silicon Valley Angel Investors Colluding Over Deals?
- Don't Read Too Much Into The Claims That Intellectual Ventures Returns Are Negative
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Passion, Profit?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Passion, Profit?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
VC's, Sex, Money and Zen
Angles and Inital round VC's are interested in building businesses, it takes many years so they don't have a choice. Later stage VC's are in it for the rapid return on their money.
"Crossing the Chasm" faster means getting paid sooner.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Not so much missing an important feature
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment