Ingram, Amazon Lose Patent Battle On On-Demand Printing

from the this-is-non-obvious? dept

These days, there are a ton of on-demand printing operations out there that will let people create a book on the fly. In some areas, they're just catching on, sometimes for vanity publishing and sometimes for better inventory control. However, it turns out that someone has a patent on the idea of on-demand printing - and a jury has ruled that Amazon and Ingram are both violating that patent. Both defendants say they believe the patent is not valid and will appeal. Unfortunately, the actual patent is not clearly explained in the article. They do say that the inventor met with Ingram prior to them starting up their own on-demand printing service - so he might have some claim. The real question is what the patent really covers - and if it's simply for the idea of on-demand printing, if that's really patentable.

5 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Internet Bookmobile

    identicon
    DV Henkel-Wallace, Mar 5th, 2004 @ 3:07am

    I hope this doesn't affect Bewster Kahle's Internet Bookmobile.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Patent Silliness

    identicon
    jb, Mar 5th, 2004 @ 6:20am

    [Snip]
    >>The real question is what the patent really covers - and if it's simply for the idea of on-demand printing, if that's really patentable.
    Since when is it necessary to present a credible idea for patenting? Amazon/Microsoft/et al have been patenting 1's and 0's for cryin' out loud. The USPTO is too busy/lazy/incompetent to check for prior art anyway.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Looks like 5,465,213

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 5th, 2004 @ 6:45am

    This looks like it. Lancaster wrote about BOD publishing in January 1990, for what that's worth.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Re: Looks like 5,465,213

    identicon
    Mark F, Mar 5th, 2004 @ 9:32am

    The whole article boils down to "when a customer wants one print out a copy of the book on a laser printer".

    That's does not seem to be worth a patent. I'm sure that prior to 1990 some organization printed documents, even just plain text ASCII ones when a customer wanted one.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Re: Looks like 5,465,213

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 7th, 2004 @ 9:23am

    The `inventor' filed his patent some months after the Lancaster articles. I just pointed at those to show that the idea of printing one-off books had been published. Lancaster isn't the `inventor' on that patent.
    The `invention' compared to the articles seems to be `um, automate the finishing'.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This