Canadian Supreme Court Supports Balance In Copyright Issues
from the balancing-users'-rights-vs-owners'-rights dept
Up in Canada, the Supreme Court has come out with a ruling saying that a legal society did not violate copyright laws by photocopying materials for lawyers, because those materials were being used for "research, review, private study or criticism." In other words, they were looking at copyrights not just as the owners' right - but as determining a balance between the creators' rights and the users' rights. As this analysis points out, this could have far reaching implications for intellectual property law in Canada, as it's a very different way of looking at the issue. However, on the negative side, it appears the judgment also ruled that people could copyright compilations of facts. Here in the US, of course, this is currently illegal, but may soon change as a result of a bill making its way through Congress.
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
- White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Yes, you can copyright facts ... sort of
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment