It seems like the further along this whole thing goes, the deeper a hole SCO is digging for themselves. While they made a big stink Monday by announcing one incredibly gullible Linux licensee, they've now officially announced their
publicity stunt lawsuit against randomly chosen AutoZone (with plans to name a bigger company later). The only reason they're doing it today, of course, is because today is earnings day, and there's been quite a bit of evidence, that all this ridiculousness has been timed for the purpose of selling stock. Both stories seem like SCO is acting a bit prematurely. They're asking people to pay for something where there's serious doubt as to whether or not SCO actually owns what they're trying to sell. There are some troubling legal issues here. The basis of both of these stories is that the companies still would have bought the same number of Linux licenses at the SCO-induced higher prices - something that basic economics tells you is likely to be untrue. However, by assuming that's the case, then the business strategy just about any software company should take would be to gain some intellectual property protection over something but keep it fairly quiet. Then go out and figure out a way to push some software that uses that intellectual property as far as possible by giving it away free. Then, once it's established, run around and bill everyone for it. That seems somewhere between bait and switch and extortion. Hopefully a court will step in and tell SCO they can't sue companies until the intellectual property claims with IBM and others are settled. At the same time, I'm also wondering why ZDNet is publishing SCO FUD as if it's a news story by itself? Darl McBride's letter to Congress is so laughably bad, however, that you wonder how this guy can actually keep a straight face when he tries to portray a world that simply doesn't exist. It's unfortunate for AutoZone, who is basically just being caught in the line of fire from a suicidal company trying to take down random innocent bystanders. Update: They've now named the second company: DaimlerChrysler. What's with the auto focus?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Scumbag Revenge Porn Site Operator Arrested... But Many Of The Charges Are Very Problematic
- Legal Challenges To Spying Mount In UK
- Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood Thinks Google Is To Blame For Infringement On The Web
- Feds To FISC: Of Course We Don't Have To Share Our Full Legal Filings With Companies Suing Us Over NSA Transparency
- Kansas City Cops Tell Man They'll Kill His Dogs And Destroy His Home If Forced To Obtain A Search Warrant