Predictions

Predictions

by Mike Masnick




CEOs Done With Cost Cutting

from the now-focused-on-cost-raising?? dept

A new study from IBM is being used to suggest that the economy is coming back. They asked a bunch of CEOs what they're focusing on now and discovered that after years of focusing on "cost cutting", CEOs are done with that. Now they're focusing on revenue generation. While the article talks about what this might mean for the economy, I find it more interesting to think about what it says about CEOs (or whoever put through this study). It seems to reinforce the silly single-minded approach to running a business, where you can only focus on one side of the cost-benefit equation at a time. In the boom years, companies only focused on revenue generation, ignoring the cost side. Since the bubble burst, it's all about controlling the cost side, without any concept of how cutting costs harms revenue generation. Now, the pendulum is apparently swinging back. At what point do CEOs realize there's more than one side to look at, and start viewing both sides together and making more informed and balanced decisions?

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Feb 24th, 2004 @ 1:13pm

    No Subject Given

    by Anonymous Coward

    I guess after years of cost cutting, there's nothing left to cut.

    Now the stupid suits have finally figured that you needed to keep some developers and marketing people to have a product to sell!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. Feb 24th, 2004 @ 3:07pm

    Not necessarily brain-damaged!

    by DV Henkel-Wallace

    I find it more interesting to think about what it says about CEOs (or whoever put through this study). It seems to reinforce the silly single-minded approach to running a business, where you can only focus on one side of the cost-benefit equation at a time.
    Actually, it's not necessarily as stupid as you think.
    First of all, your company could be in trouble, so you don't have time to grow the business before it runs out of cash. So you have to get your burn rate below the income rate and hope that you keep the business running in the mean time.
    Secondly, and this is the worse one, the markets may have "fashion" and may penalize you for certain kinds of investment. So yes, although you're always pedalling and steering at the same time, you may need to emphasize one or the other in order to 1> get all employees on the same page and 2> get the market to understand what you're doing.
    And while we may say that the best businesses should just ignore the markets and run themselves the "best" way possible, if you need more capital with which to grow you can't ignore market fashions.
    There are other reasons too, but these are the big top 2.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It