Lawyer In Murder Case Trying To Prove GPS Is Junk Science

from the um...-good-luck-with-that-one dept

We've written before about court cases that involve some element of technology, where a lawyer convinces a judge or a jury of something by simply using a lot of techno-babble that doesn't make sense, in an effort to prove a point that simply isn't true. It sounds like that's what a lawyer is about to do in the well hyped Laci Peterson murder trial here in California. Scott Peterson's lawyer is going to try to have the court exclude GPS evidence on Peterson's whereabouts by claiming GPS technology is unreliable and inaccurate and has "not been generally accepted by the scientific community." Considering the number of applications that use GPS technology with pinpoint accuracy every day, they're going to have a tough time convincing many people on this one.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Clear line of sight?

    identicon
    Anonymoose Cow-ard, Feb 11th, 2004 @ 6:53am

    GPS requires clear line of sight to at least 3 satellites for a valid position.

    Have you ever tried to use one of those GPS based automobile direction computers (the kind like Hertz uses) during a heavy rainstorm? The GPS guidance computer is completely useless and won't track your position at all.

    Perhaps the lawyers will use this type of explanation to prove that even though GPS works well when you have clear line of sight to satellites, there are times when GPS is useless and meaningless.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    hail mary time

    identicon
    eeyore, Feb 11th, 2004 @ 8:56am

    First the satanic cult defense, now this? Peterson's defense must be getting absolutely desperate.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: Clear line of sight?

    identicon
    A known Amos Cowherd, Feb 11th, 2004 @ 10:08am

    I have four different GPSes and two of them can read my position inside my living room with none of the windows open or with a view of the sky. Granted, the signal is weak and the accuracy is between 50 and 100 feet, but it can get a lock.
    Heavy tree cover can reduce accuracy to 40-50 feet. Strong electrical storms can cause you to lose tracking in the open. I've never had this happen for more than a few minutes, but I guess that could be enough time for me to get from Monterey to San Diego in my super sonic invisible jet.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Re: Clear line of sight?

    identicon
    Gary, Feb 11th, 2004 @ 11:20am

    Well, First off you need to know what GPS device is in question. There is a big differance between a corrected GPS signal a ship might use to navigate and a $100 garmin from sportmart. I have clocked my back porch at over 60mph and watched it jump as much as 300ft according to my cheap GPS.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Re: Clear line of sight?

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 11th, 2004 @ 3:03pm

    "I have clocked my back porch at over 60mph..."

    Did you get a ticket?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    Next Line of Defense...

    identicon
    Joe Baderderm, Feb 11th, 2004 @ 10:43pm

    If the GPS defense doesn't work, they will probably use the Chewbacca defense.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This