Chinese Department Store Facing Copyright Violation Charges For Muzak

from the gotta-pay-for-that-background-music dept

The US and Europe aren't the only places dealing with the copyright police trying to get fees out of every possible use of music. Over in China, a department store has been sued for not paying fees for the background music they played in the store. They're being accused of copyright violation for "profit-making purposes." The department store defends itself, in part, on focusing on issues specific to the (recently changed) local law on the issue, but making a few more important general points. First, they say that the "profit-making purposes" concept is laughable. As evidence, they point out that they stopped playing the background music last month - and there has been no noticeable impact on sales within the store. At the same time, they feel that they're actually helping musicians get more recognition by playing their works in such a busy store. They point out that "the copyright owners of the songs benefit from this as their works were made more widely known through us."

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Muzak Trademark Misuse

    identicon
    Beck, Feb 5th, 2004 @ 7:37am

    "Muzak" is an actual product - http:\www.muzak.com. It is a service that you pay for, and one of the things it is designed to do is affect the behavior of shoppers.

    This store was playing music, but not Muzak.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: Muzak Trademark Misuse

    icon
    Mike (profile), Feb 5th, 2004 @ 8:48am

    That's true, but it has become genericized - like Xerox and Kleenex. I see nothing wrong with the use here (as it was also used in the article that way).

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This