Hollywood Pulls A Felten On DVD CSS Hosting Case

from the amazing dept

In a surprise move today, the folks suing Andrew Bunner for hosting (not writing) a copy of the DeCSS code that is available all over the internet have dropped the case, basically admitting that they were going to lose, and it wasn't worth bothering with. The case was very weak from the beginning, and even involved trying to argue completely irrelevant issues in court to hide the fact that they couldn't win on the issues. This is good news, though, once again, it's a situation where the entertainment industry has dropped a case that they started, rather than lost the case. This is becoming quite a pattern - ever since they did this with Ed Felten. Basically, they sue people (or threaten to sue them) until they fight back - and then drop the case before the courts can rule against them and set a precedent. Can we call this "Pulling a Felten"?

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Pulled a Rosen?

    identicon
    LittleW0lf, Jan 22nd, 2004 @ 9:26pm

    Considering the fact that Ed Felten wasn't the one who pulled out of the lawsuit after he discovered the other side would most likely win, if I was Felten I'd find the phrase "Pulled a Felten" to be a defamation of character. I think "Pulled a Rosen" would be a lot more apropos, though I am not sure Hilary had anything with the decision to drop out of the lawsuit.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: Pulled a Rosen?

    icon
    Mike (profile), Jan 22nd, 2004 @ 11:54pm

    Hmm. Interesting point. I'd much rather give publicity to Ed Felten than to Hilary Rosen... It wasn't meant at all to be negative on Felten to give him more publicity for continuing to fight the good fight against these types of actions.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: Pulled a Rosen?

    identicon
    Oliver Wendell Jones, Jan 23rd, 2004 @ 5:59am

    How about instead of a phrase that refers to the idiots who changed their minds, we create a phrase that refers to the people who stuck to their guns when they knew they had done nothing wrong... we could call it "scoring a Felten"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    The legal system needs to change....

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 24th, 2004 @ 9:21pm

    ...perhas people who indended on filing legal suits should be required to follow through once the other party has engauged legal councel.

    Works in other countries... of course, the USA is the be all and end all of democracy and legal systems right? (wrong!)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Re: Pulled a Rosen?

    identicon
    LittleW0lf, Jan 25th, 2004 @ 12:51am

    "scoring a Felten"

    Thanks Oliver, that sounds a lot better.

    I don't necessarily think "pulling a Felten" is meant to be negative towards Ed Felten, but considering the fact that it is used to describe a shady legal maneuver that Ed had nothing to do with as far as the decision to employ it was concerned (other than not roll over and take it.) If it were me, I'd prefer "scoring a Felten" over "pulling a Felten".

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    Re: The legal system needs to change....

    identicon
    LittleW0lf, Jan 25th, 2004 @ 12:59am

    ...perhas people who indended on filing legal suits should be required to follow through once the other party has engauged legal councel.

    I agree, though I think it should go futher than that...if anyone filing a lawsuit decides to pull out after the defense gets legal counsel, they should be forced to pay the defendant's legal bills. That is the way it is when a plantiff looses a legal battle in most cases, why can't a withdrawl be threated as a loss. If it gets to the court, it should be required to be decided, even if the plantiff decides not to continue with the complaint.

    I think it would cut back on the costs of the legal system too, and put lawyers with questionable ethics into a much more difficult situation. Can anyone think of a reason why this wouldn't be a good idea?

    the USA is the be all and end all of democracy and legal systems right?

    Nobody here has said that it was... And I am not about to get into an argument with you of violent agreement again.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This