Songwriters Want Dual Payments For Copy Protected CDs

from the oh,-sweet-irony dept

For all the effort the recording industry has put into making sure that they get paid for every single song that appears anywhere - it looks like they may have painted themselves into something of a corner. The current popular copy protection scheme is what's known as a "dual session" CD - where two sets of songs are included on the CD. The first one is like a regular CD, and plays music when the CD is placed in a standard CD player. The second set of songs is called if the CD is put into a computer CD tray - and includes mechanisms to prevent copying. The problem is that the publishers and songwriters claim that each CD sold with such dual sessions should count as if two copies of each song had been sold. In other words, they want to get paid double for each of these CDs. As ridiculous as this sounds, using the recording industry's own logic, it makes perfect sense.

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    I don't think it sounds that crazy...

    identicon
    Milnesy, Jan 13th, 2004 @ 12:11pm

    Songwriters are paid for every record created for a certain song. If you are going to create technology that requires the song to be on the media twice, then the song writers should get paid. They get paid pennies anyway, so this should help them out a little more. Either that, or it will be a good leverage point to prevent copy protected cds from being distributed.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: I don't think it sounds that crazy...

    identicon
    LittleW0lf, Jan 13th, 2004 @ 1:09pm

    If you are going to create technology that requires the song to be on the media twice, then the song writers should get paid. They get paid pennies anyway, so this should help them out a little more.

    Of course, the RIAA will use this as an excuse to tack on four more dollars to the $18 per CD cost their members charge their customers, even though the songwriter gets another $0.02 for the CD. And then they will complain even louder why customers aren't buying half of what they bought last year because of illegal file sharing.

    As much as I think this is a good idea, I think the ultimate goal is to cut out as much of the middle-greed-monsters as we can, since their short-term greed is hurting everyone else, including the folks that they are "sworn to protect" (which is laughable at best, since the RIAA couldn't possibly care any less for the musicians they steal from, nor the customer they steal from.)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Yes it does. Re: I don't think it sounds that craz

    identicon
    Inner Critic, Jan 14th, 2004 @ 7:59am

    You know, my car drives on both the highway and city streets. I should really be paying twice as much for it.

    What a bunch of jack@$$es. Wish I could dictate that kind of nonsense in my field. "I'd like you pay double for anything you use in two different players."

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    This is why people pirate digital music

    identicon
    Joe Smith, Jan 14th, 2004 @ 10:42am

    It is this kind of greedy, money-grubbing bullshit that is one of main reasons why people download illegal MP3s... and like the other poster said, this will give the RIAA something else to blame waning CD sales figures on. What a bunch of jackasses!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This