The Supreme Court turned down appeals on two different tech related cases today. Both of which were probably good decisions. First, they refused to hear the appeal on the Aimster case, concerning the file sharing program that was shut down by a judge. While the initial ruling doesn't necessarily make sense compared to very different rulings concerning programs like Morpheus and Grokster, the Aimster case had a few specific factors that probably make it bad for precedent setting. At some point, a similar case will eventually reach the Supreme Court - but with a better set of facts backing it. The second appeal the court refused to hear was on a First Amendment challenge to the law banning junk faxes. This means that the law stands as is, and the FTC can continue to unsuccessfully try to shut down Fax.com.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Ex-FBI Agent, Trauma Surgeon Testify That Kelly Thomas' Death Was A Result Of Officers' Excessive Force
- Scumbag Revenge Porn Site Operator Arrested... But Many Of The Charges Are Very Problematic
- Legal Challenges To Spying Mount In UK
- Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood Thinks Google Is To Blame For Infringement On The Web
- Feds To FISC: Of Course We Don't Have To Share Our Full Legal Filings With Companies Suing Us Over NSA Transparency