Overhype

Overhype

by Mike Masnick




Where's My Flying Car?

from the not-here-yet dept

It's been decades since people have suggested that everyone would have a flying car or a personal jetpack. There are any number of "flying" technologies that futurists expected to be commonplace by the new millennium, and here we are a few years in and we're still pretty firmly grounded. MSNBC is looking at seven "promised" flying technologies that still haven't come home - from flying cars to personal jetpacks to regular supersonic commercial air travel (bye bye Concorde) to space tourism. Some of these may come true eventually, but they've all been talked about for years, and we don't seem that much closer.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Nov 17th, 2003 @ 4:29pm
  • Homosexual Fighter Jets

    by dorpus

    We've got a generation of "stealth" aircraft painted black, but black is actually not a very good choice for stealth. Pink is in fact the best color, because on average, it blends into the sky better during various lighting conditions. However, military brass didn't like the idea of pink fighter jets flying around, so we have these unstealthy black planes that get shot down a lot.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Nov 18th, 2003 @ 1:22am
    • Re: Homosexual Fighter Jets

      by Anonymous Coward

      Dorpus, I gotta know: Just where do you *get* half the stuff you post? These facts ae absurd, like you're channelling Cliff Claven or something worse.

      Stop messing with our mind.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Nov 18th, 2003 @ 2:17am
      • Re: Homosexual Fighter Jets

        by Anonymous Coward

        Yeah, well, he gets it from open sources and we all know how reliable those are...

        ...the next gen. night fighters are pink-red, intermixed with bule-white (and tarmac/cloud/sea-water grey-green ontop).

        Of course the reality that very few anti-aircraft weapons are visually guided probably never enters into the equation, does it? Gee, I wonder what the color of radar reflecting materials and paints are... nah, that doesn't have any bearing on reality.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Nov 18th, 2003 @ 2:59am
        • Re: Homosexual Fighter Jets

          by dorpus

          How does Popular Science (May 1997) sound? This site talks about it.

          "Black is one of the least stealthy colors for daytime flying at medium altitudes. In fact,the British Roval Air Force is painting its trainers black to make them more visible and reduce the risk of collisions. Black isn't much good at night either, because there is nearly always some light from the moon. That's why the latest F-117s have been seen in a more sensible gray color."


          The reality is that recent downings of US military aircraft have all been done by visually guided shoulder-launched missiles. That includes the F-117 bomber shot down over Yugoslavia, and all the recent helicopters shot down in Iraq.

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

          • Nov 18th, 2003 @ 5:03am
          • Re: Homosexual Fighter Jets

            by eeyore

            Too bad stealth fighters are intended primarily for nighttime operations. It's virtually impossible to camouflage an aircraft in broad daylight so it's pointless to speculate over whether hot pink or avocado green is better for daytime stealth.

            Popular Science? That's a step above getting it off a cereal box.

            (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

            • Nov 18th, 2003 @ 4:42pm
            • Re: Homosexual Fighter Jets

              by dorpus

              Too bad stealth fighters are intended primarily for nighttime operations. It's virtually impossible to camouflage an aircraft in broad daylight so it's pointless to speculate over whether hot pink or avocado green is better for daytime stealth.

              Conversely, is it possible that stealth planes are used at night only because the military is unwilling to fly pink planes? How much more operational flexibility would we have, indeed how much more flexible would the military's wrist be, if we could perform daytime stealth bombing?


              Popular Science? That's a step above getting it off a cereal box.

              How about this one?

              Calvert, Denis J. Pumas Go Pink: The Military Build-Up in the Gulf Has Seen Many Operational Changes--The Least of Which Are Camouflage Schemes. Air Combat 19:18-22+ Feb '91.

              (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It