Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   Exactly

   

   Beck, Nov 12th, 2003 @ 9:07pm

   
   

   This article is right on. My father wanted a phone, and for him it had to be very simple with just the number buttons, "send", and "end", and have big buttons. The only way we could find that was to lease an old reconditioned phone.
   
   I would think that a phone company could make a pretty good market by advertising a line of phones as high quality, yet simple and easy. It seems that with all electronics products the only way to get "simple and easy" is to go to the low end manufacturers who sell crap to people who buy solely based on price. Some people want a reduced feature set but are willing to pay more for better quality.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Consumer confusion

   

   AMetamorphosis, Nov 13th, 2003 @ 6:27am

   
   

   I have a Motorol T720 without the camera and it still took me a day to read the manual, fool around with the phone & actually get used to all the so called " features ". Last month my Dad got the same phone and I would like to smash the head in of the salesperson @ Verizon that sold it to him ! My Dad really doesn't want or need all these features but feels compelled to use them because he paid for them. As a result, I have spent countless phone calls and hours of time trying to help him learn how to use the damn thing. My Dad would be much better served with a simple cell phone with an address book of frequently called numbers & caller ID. The same thing with my Mom. Neither of them want all the " toys " but just TRY and find a simple cell phone today !
   Has anyone noticed that this appears to be a trend in ALL consumer appliances today ? How many times have you been over @ a friends and had a hard time trying to simply heat something up in their microwave ? Or tried to turn on their home entertainment center ( TV ) and had to ask for assistance ?
   I seriously take into consideration how " user friendly " a device is before buying it now days. If I cannot use the BASIC features without reading the owners manual I won't buy the item.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   No Subject Given

   

   w.h., Nov 13th, 2003 @ 8:37am

   
   

   It's not just that.
   
   My desired feature set for a phone is basicly my aging Startac phone with a few choice new features. I am a gearhead and I do like new features, but I don't care about some of the features features.
   
   The annoying part is that the combination of features I want -- generally having 1x-rtt 2.5g data and bluetooth -- aren't available. Maddening.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Well maybe *one* feature

   

   Andrew, Nov 13th, 2003 @ 11:40am

   
   

   Count me in -- I'd like that phone with an address book and Caller ID. Perfect. Well... being able to receive text messages is also good (to get CNN news alerts, you see).
   And y'know, a camera would also be cool if it was easy to e-mail the pictures. And... and...
   You see how this gets started. Ask 1,000 people and if each suggests just one or two it-would-be-cool features you end up with a phone with more computing power than the Apollo program and a 200-page manual. Blech.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   Re: Well maybe *one* feature

   

   Andrew, Nov 13th, 2003 @ 11:42am

   
   

   Whoops -- meant to say 'it would be cool if it had a camera and it was easy to e-mail the pictures...'

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   Re: Well maybe *one* feature

   

   AMetamorphosis, Nov 14th, 2003 @ 9:04am

   
   

   This still doesn't resolve the problem that a SIMPLE model needs to be made available san " features " for those not wanting " features ".
   It really is as simple as that.
   
   Besides, even the most retarded phone users have adjusted to caller ID and preprogrammed #'s.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment