The Anti-Spam Company Conflict

from the where's-the-incentive dept

You always have to wonder about businesses that are based on the premise that, if they're really successfully in what they do, you won't need them any more. That's certainly the case with anti-spam companies, who are apparently making pretty good money these days. While I'm sure that the vast majority of them do mean well, and plenty of their tools work very well in stamping out spam - you do have to wonder about their incentives to really stop spam. If spam were stopped, then these companies wouldn't have much of a reason for being in business any more. In other words, the more successful they are, the less successful they will be. That's a tough business proposition for any company.

5 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    This is not new

    identicon
    Three Men In A Boat, Nov 5th, 2003 @ 10:22am

    ... the more successful they are, the less successful they will be.

    This is also the case in many other businesses... doctors and car mechanics, for example. So this isn't really new, and people, as consumers, are either aware of this or not.

    In a free market system, consumers have a choice about which vendor to use, and it's up to them to be aware that they have a choice.

    Also, just like doctors and car mechanics, fixing one problem doesn't fix all problems. The spammers are crafty and are constantly tuning their "product". The anti-spammers then have to be craftier in response.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Beck, Nov 5th, 2003 @ 10:26am

    Other companies that work under that business proposition manage to survive. Take for example the companies that make immunization drugs.

    These new anti-spam companies will likely diversify their product lines once the market for their product matures.

    Let's just hope they don't take after the volunteer firefighter who drummed up business for his department.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: This is not new

    icon
    Mike (profile), Nov 5th, 2003 @ 10:41am

    I never said it was new, but I do think it's quite different than doctors or car mechanics. Both those businesses are based on fixing things that break down, on the knowledge that older systems simply do breakdown.

    Spam is a problem that, if it's successfully blocked, the incentive for spamming goes away, and the problem goes away.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Most do not try to solve the root problem

    identicon
    Chris, Nov 5th, 2003 @ 11:41am

    Most anti-spam companies (by this I assume you mean companies that provide ant spam services) are not attempting to solve the spam problem by eliminating the spammers, or change the technology to reduce the ability to spam, or even to influence legislation cracking down on spammers. All that anti spam companies do is try to stem the tide at the recieving end.
    So if there is a change in the future that reduces or eliminates the ability of spammers to carry out their work (not likely in the sort term) perhaps the anti-spam companies will be in trouble.
    But really this is no different from other computer technologies. Look at the compainies that did CD burning. Or companies that did scanning of images or any number of other techniologies that were onces expensive and difficult but is now cheap/commonplace.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    The March of Dimes had a Similar Problem

    identicon
    Precision Blogger, Nov 5th, 2003 @ 4:21pm

    The March of Dimes charity originally focused on obliterating Polio. When that actually happened (the Salk vaccine was developed in 1955), they scrambled to re-purpose the charity (of course they didn't use the awful word "re-purpose" in those days), to avoid becoming pointless.

    - The Precision Blogger
    http://precision-blogging.blogspot.com

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This