Popping The Friendster Bubble
from the well,-it's-about-time... dept
Well, it seems that the mainstream press isn't swallowing all the Friendster hype either. While we have been expressing our concerns about the space, much of the mainstream press has bought the bubble-like story of how Friendster is the next big thing. Business Week, though, has taken a step back from the hype to see if there's any there there in all this hype about Friendster. The reporter comes to the conclusion that it's a "classic case of Valley disconnect", where many of the folks going gaga over Friendster haven't actually thought it through beyond the fact that plenty of people have signed up to use the service. The article suggests (unlike Friendster's claim) that friends aren't necessarily the best people for finding dates. More importantly, it notes the problems with make friendships explicit, since many people feel obligated to say someone is a friend, rather than explicitly exclude them. As one person says in the article: "I'll get friend requests from people I haven't spoken to in over a year. It's hard to say no, so you don't, and maybe you catch up a little. But eventually you realize there's a reason I haven't spoken to that person, and that's because I didn't need them in my life."
3 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Cybersecurity Bill Backers Insist This Isn't SOPA... But Is It Needed?
- If The RIAA Wants To Talk About Misinformation Campaigns, Let's Start With The RIAA's Misinformation Campaign
- UK Report Blames The Internet For Terrorism, Says ISPs Should Take Down Content
- NY Times: RIAA & MPAA Exaggerate Piracy Impact Stats... But We're Going To Assume They're True Anyway
- Author Jonathan Franzen Thinks That Ebooks Mean The World Will No Longer Work





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
It's Lame
My first (and lasting) impression is that it is essentially a place for 20 somethings with piercings to get laid. Since I am out of my 20s, have no piercings and have a Mrs. Director, I decided to quit after exploring it for a few days (I tried to tailor my interest to business, doing a start-up, etc., but that was a waste of time).
So as a business, I don't get it. Yeah, it has a lot of people, but how many would pay for it? What's the revenue model (not even to mention the profit model). Why are VCs pouring money into a free dating service?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's Lame
As for business uses, look at LinkedIn, as well. I can see (a little) how that has some potential - but again don't see the business model. So far, I've had a few people make connections "through" me, but they were incredible weak connections that were probably worth the nothing that people paid to make them.
As I've said before, the people who provide the real value to such a system - the real "hubs" of social networks are the least likely to find value out of the system and the least likely to use them. The ones who need it most are those who don't have the connections. Thus, it's a system for subsidizing the connections of the unconnected by using the work of the ultra-connected. Most ultra-connected people I know prefer to protect their rolodex than give it out to people who haven't been able to build their own network yet.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
.........
why do i see
here and there in my friendster ?
it's soo irritating such that it's difficult for me to read my comments
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment