MPAA Begins Project To Brainwash School Children

from the nice-try dept

Last month, we mentioned the scary news that one of the MPAA's latest tactics against file sharing was to create an entire educational program which they would present in schools. Well, that program launched yesterday in schools across the country, and they're not even remotely subtle in how one-sided they paint the picture. For example, they tell students "If you haven't paid for it, you've stolen it." Except, well, that's not true at all. If, for example, the MP3s were placed up there by those who do own the rights to the music, then it's perfectly legal. Even if it's music that hasn't been put up their by those who own the rights, it's copyright infringement (and you may have some fair use rights) and not theft. Wendy Seltzer at the EFF goes through a few other problems with the "educational" program. Plenty of people are upset about this. Some with the one-sided content, and others with the fact that students are being bribed with incentives such as free DVDs, DVD players, movie tickets and trips to Hollywood (um... I thought if they hadn't paid for it, they had stolen it...) for writing essays about why file sharing is bad. Of course, in the end, this might not be such a big deal, as many of the students who get this lesson will realize how ridiculous it is. The article linked above reviews one presenter giving the lesson in San Francisco where students roll their eyes and challenge many of the statements made. Just in titling it "What's the Diff? A Guide to Digital Citizenship", (their weak attempt at sounding on top of the latest jargon) most kids will immediately see through this as a ridiculous corporate front.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    LittleW0lf, Oct 23rd, 2003 @ 6:23pm

    Dumb and Dumber?

    How many teachers or volunteers will look at this material and question it? I think even the dumbest teacher I had in school would look at this and see it for what it is worth (toilet paper? bedding for the class gerbil?)

    The only thing I have to worry about is that they may actually try to give this crap to California Schools, because with the current budget and layoffs for teachers, administrators, etc., it isn't likely any school district in California will likely have the money to buy this crap.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      LittleW0lf, Oct 23rd, 2003 @ 6:47pm

      Re: Dumb and Dumber?

      I particularly like the "What's Fair?" section...kinda made me ponder if the MPAA really has thought this one through? Of course, the document does not contain any answers what-so-ever to the questions, so I am left wondering what the answers they were fishing for. (I've never used Kazaa, and I own over 1,000 CDs, and over 200 movies, but I've not been buying too many recently, except from indies, so screw you "copying is stealing" folks, I don't copy, but I can see right through this crap!)

      * Kary is developing promotional materials for her club's annual charity walk for children. Kary decides to download pictures from the Internet to use on her poster....

      Fair Use??? Oh, yeah, according to the MPAA, fair use is only a defense, and thus doesn't exist. What about pictures downloaded from a free or public domain source. What if she includes an attribution?

      You did all the work on your team project, but others got all the credit?

      You live with it... It will happen all through your life, especially when you work for a boss who asks you to do something and then takes your work and uses it to prove that they are worth keeping. Oh, I got a better one, what if you write a song and send it to a music company, and they steal it and sell it without giving you a dime...

      Your friend wrote a song and sent it to a music company. A rock group recorded it, but your friend was never paid for the song.

      Damn...they're good. But I figure the answer to this one is "tough kids, we own all music, and you are lucky we didn't charge you with copyright infringement when you sent us the music in the first place. We have better lawyers, and will unleash them on you if you don't go away." How many musicians get $0.02 of the $18.00 their music sells for? I'll happily send my $15.00 per CD to the indies because I know $13.00 of the $15.00 is going to the artist.)

      Simon lost his wallet. A friend found it, but decided to keep it.

      So what does this have to do with copyright infringement? The store doesn't loose a CD when someone illegally copies it, they just loose a sale (and even this is debateable.)

      Jane copied her friend Sally's answers during a math test.

      I can do this too: Is Sally to blame for allowing Jane to copy the answers?

      Sam found John's homework, put his name it [SIC] and turned it in. Now, John is in trouble for not doing his homework.

      Ahhhh, poor John. You know, I've not, in my many years of school, actually seen this happen. However, I figure that if Sam turned in John's homework, the teacher could probably figure it out. After all, Sam has never turned in his homework, and John is damn regular at turning in his...

      etc...etc...etc...this drivel goes on and on.



       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    bastard sam, Oct 24th, 2003 @ 12:44am

    No Subject Given

    It's only copyright infringement if you distribute it. You could in theory download anything you want, without being held legally accountable... unless you share it. The consequences there are draconian, it's just not worth it. Besides, I'm sure there are thousands of guys in taiwon and other places that will have all the pirated content I could ever want. Let em try to stop me. Wooo hoo hoo hahaha.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 24th, 2003 @ 7:59am

    No Subject Given

    How long is it before we start selling AD space on the desktops of our kids.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    rax, Oct 24th, 2003 @ 10:58am

    Hmmm... where have I heard this before?

    C.R.A.P - CopyRight Abuse Prevention Program

    Billed as the kind of program that you resort to when nothing else seems to work. Sort of like trying to fix a severed limb with a bandaid.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    bob the katt, Feb 22nd, 2007 @ 4:55am

    vnk

    u guys suck balls

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 13th, 2007 @ 3:32am

    "U guys suck balls" ??? was that aimed at the MPAA or the posters above?

    If it was aimed at the posters above, whats the bet that you could trace vnk's IP back to the MPAA's HQ

    As a weird site note:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dantes_Inferno

    Which circle of hell do MPAA staff go to?

    The third circle is for gluttons

    Fourth Circle. Those whose concern for material goods deviated from the desired mean are punished in this circle. They include the avaricious or miserly, who hoarded possessions.

    Fifth Circle is for the wrathful / slothful

    Seventh Circle, Outer ring, housing the violent against people and property.

    Seventh Circle, Inner ring: for those violent against art!

    Eighth Circle. The fraudulent—those guilty of deliberate, knowing evil

    Ninth Circle. Traitors, distinguished from the "merely" fraudulent in that their acts involve betraying one in a special relationship to the betrayer

    Maybe they take short vacations between the various circles depending on their current mood?

    Then again we have the terraces of Purgatory:

    First Terrace: The proud get weighed down by huge boulders on their backs!

    Second Terrace: the envious!

    Third terrace: The wrathful

    Fifth: The avaricious

    Sixth: The gluttonous

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    jakerome (profile), Jun 8th, 2010 @ 10:44am

    All those links, dead ended by myopia

    Such a shame, isn't it? Two interesting articles, forever lost to domain transfers, corporate policy & website rejiggering. How many millions of articles are that much less valuable because the sources cannot be found. There's got to be a better way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    jakerome (profile), Mar 24th, 2011 @ 5:40pm

    Wild. Just happened to click through to this story (2 clicks from today's home page), for some odd reason decided to peruse the comments, and discovered I left a comment 10 months ago. How odd, especially considering how rarely I comment, how rarely I browse old stories, and how rarely I read comments.

    Wild.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This