RSS
Oscar Voters May Get Marked Screeners
from the take-two dept
Last week everyone was talking about Jack Valenti's decree that the movie studios would no longer send out "screener" DVDs to Oscar voters, because he believed those copies were ending up online. As some people stepped back and pointed out just how silly this was (he was even banning screeners for movies that will be out on DVD soon anyway), they say the real reason for the ban is to help big studio pictures win the Oscars over independent films that have been winning more awards lately. However, the backlash is making Valenti reconsider, and he is apparently talking about a compromise where the studios could send out video tapes (not DVDs) that include special watermarks on the prints. This way, if they did get online, they could easily be traced back to which voter put the movie there.
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- If The RIAA Wants To Talk About Misinformation Campaigns, Let's Start With The RIAA's Misinformation Campaign
- UK Report Blames The Internet For Terrorism, Says ISPs Should Take Down Content
- NY Times: RIAA & MPAA Exaggerate Piracy Impact Stats... But We're Going To Assume They're True Anyway
- Author Jonathan Franzen Thinks That Ebooks Mean The World Will No Longer Work
- Misguided Twitter Protests... And Why Twitter Could Have Explained Itself Better
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Studio Screeners
VeriTouch has an encrypted DVD player that makes use of our PED (Personalized Encrypted Disk).
Only one person in the world can play back their encrypted disk on their player after their fingerprint is scanned.
No disk can be copied, no disk can be played by anyone but the authorized recipient.
End of problem, across the board.
Gary E. Brant, CEO
VeriTouch Ltd.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment