DSL And Cable Beginning To Differentiate
from the slowly,-surely dept
For years, people considered DSL and cable to be pretty much interchangeable. However, now, each side is making some adjustments to their offerings to try to differentiate themselves. DSL is positioning themselves as cheap broadband access while cable internet providers are boosting speeds to position themselves as something of a premium, but speedy connection. Of course, these are somewhat artificial definitions, as either one could be speedy (or cheap) under proper circumstances. The real issue is whether or not people really care that much about the speed. Certainly, plenty of early adopter types do, but many folks just want the always-on connection, and if DSL is half the price of cable, they're going to get the business - that is, until applications become common that really require speed.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Another difference
Cable systems have a very limited upstream bandwidth, and that bandwidth is shared by up to a thousand users on each segment. With cable, it's real easy for a single user to fill up the upstream bandwidth and bog down all of the other users on the segment. Consequently, just about every cable ISP prohibits its users from running any kind of server, which would include P2P clients.
Each DSL user, on the other hand, has a fixed and dedicated amount of upstream bandwidth, and what one user does with the bandwidth won't affect other users.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
AUP is a big factor
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Another difference
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
security and privacy
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment