Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   No Subject Given

   

   Matt, Sep 30th, 2003 @ 2:39am

   
   

   but surely the game itself has a "box" that they think outside of, so unless they get some rabid fundamentalist to create the game's ultimate framework (within which is the "box" for a democratic western nation) this will be no training at all?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Simulation vs Prediction

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2003 @ 2:49am

   
   

   Need to be a little carefule here. Poindexter's plan was probably put forward in response, not to studies suggesting a greater knowldge known by a group, but to actual open-ended futures markets that operate in other parts of the world. Certainly the best indicator of the 9/11 attack were short selling in our very own legalized gambling futures stock market. Open-ended futures markets are merely a method by which signal can be extracted from noise.
   
   Anyway, this is very different from a simulation in which you have automatic feeds from various signals intelligence sources (ship lications, international cellphone/fax usage, location of known red-force operatives, targeting data, etc.) If they're trying to model the emergence of groups with common goals via a sims based model, I think they're just going to be wasting taxpayer dollars (something that they've become very good at lately).
   
   Funny thing thought... all the teen-geek news sites carried the story eventhough it has very little to do with gaming as the average person knows it.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment