Legal Issues

Legal Issues

by Mike Masnick




Maybe Patents Aren't Such A Hot Idea

from the time-to-rethink-your-assumptions dept

Last year, the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights issued a report saying that developing nations were probably better off without intellectual property laws like those we have in the US. For many poor nations, the report determined, such laws would be much more harmful than helpful. Rather than stimulating innovation, they helped to raise prices and stifle innovation. While that report has been mostly ignored, more and more evidence is showing up every day to support that. Now, some research coming out of Berkeley shows that societies without patent laws may be much better at creating innovation. Of course, this will come to no surprise to many people - but it's good to see more research supporting this idea. It's important to promote innovation in society - but too many of those who support our intellectual property system refuse to take a critical look at it to understand whether or not it really does what it is supposed to do. In many cases, when it can be shown to inhibit, rather than promote, innovation, we are told that there simply is no better system, and we should live with it. This is a dangerous position to take and will end up doing much more harm to our abilities to innovate.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Sep 29th, 2003 @ 9:10am
  • My Take is a Little Different

    by Munich

    > societies without patent laws may be much< br>> better at creating innovation

    My reading of the article was that different societies may do better with different patent laws based on the underpinnings of their economy (agricultural, technical, etc.) and culture, NOT a blanket statement that societies without patent laws do better.

    But one can speculate on theory or look around and decide where innovation is actually happening today.

    Part of the issue with patents is that today a lot (but certainly not all) of research depends on large amounts of capital being dedicated by for-profit organizations. Without some protection from that innovation just being copied (say, a new drug), why would a corporation invest the resources?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Sep 30th, 2003 @ 2:03am
    • Re: My Take is a Little Different

      by satarc

      "why would a corporation invest the resources?"

      maybe to do something good and right for a change!!!

      ;p

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It