Telemarketing Group Agrees To Obey Do Not Call

from the where's-the-catch? dept

Well, here's a twist in the on-again, off-again (then on-again, off-again again) national "do not call" list. The Direct Marketing Association (one of the main parties in the lawsuit that says the list violates the First Amendment) has said that even though the list has been blocked, its members will agree not to call those on the list. So, this raises some questions. Why did they bring the lawsuit in the first place if they have no problem obeying the list? Did they suddenly become enlightened overnight and realize that people who say they don't want to receive calls probably are a waste of their time and money? I doubt it. Chances are it has occurred to someone at the DMA (they are marketers, even if very weak ones) that continuing to call people who are on the list after October 1st would be such a PR nightmare that it would do a lot more harm than good. What they're probably hoping for is that this situation will get dragged out in the courts, and people will begin to pay less attention to it, and then, if the ruling stands, they'll slowly start ignoring the list again. There won't be any fines to pay, since the list won't be a law, and so if anyone gets angry, the offending telemarketer will get a slap on the wrist and move on.

3 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Only in America

    identicon
    ::CORY::, Sep 26th, 2003 @ 4:24pm

    Only in America can almost half of the country vote for one man and then he can go on to become president and nearly half of the country say no to telemarketer calls and get baraged with threats to fight it in court.

    A person's decision has an individual is now dead in this country.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    A History Lesson

    identicon
    xdroop, Sep 27th, 2003 @ 4:01am

    Nothing in the Constitution compels us to listen to or view any unwanted communication, whatever its merit. We therefore categorically reject the argument that a vendor has a right under the Constitution or otherwise to send unwanted material into the home of another.
      - Chief Justice Warren Burger in 1970

    This 'First Ammendment' crap is really tiring. When will you Americans get it? The right to free speach means the freedom to speak without restriction -- but it in no way guarantees you the right to compel any target audience to listen to you.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Mike, Don't be silly...

    identicon
    Precision Blogger, Sep 29th, 2003 @ 6:49am

    The Telemarketers have figured out that it might be good business to concentrate on the people who have not joined the do not call list. But in case that doesn't work for them, they'd love to be able to call everyone again. They're just trying to keep their F**king options open.

    Bear mind that some of the people on the do not call list are "Stop me before I sin again" people, who desperately want to avoid buying lots more stuff from telemarketers. If the TMS could market to people on the do not call list who have bought at least three things from TMs, they might have a goldmine.

    - The Precision Blogger
    precision-blogging.blogspot.com

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This