How The Ohio Cable Modem Uncappers Fared

from the a-little-perspective-please dept

Dave writes in with a link following up on a story from last year about some Ohio residents who found themselves facing federal crimes prosecution for simply uncapping their cable modems. The details of the story were sickening. While you can understand why a cable company might get annoyed at someone for uncapping their cable modem to allow for faster speeds - at most you'd expect a warning letter or (worst case) cutting off the service. Instead, this cable company happened to "estimate" damages of over $11,000 a person (with no justification). It just so happens that was the level needed to get the FBI interested - so suddenly these folks who wanted a little more bandwidth found themselves facing federal charges. In a followup to the story, it was noted that the cable company was coming down particularly hard on a lawyer they didn't like due to some of his actions as a local prosecutor. So now, a year later, Broadband Reports has written up a followup to look at what happened to all of the accused uncappers. Most of them settled, paying thousands of dollars in fines and agreeing to community service. Some cases were dropped outright. The lawyer, though, went to court - and won. It turned out that the terms of service from the cable company didn't actually say you couldn't uncap your modem. No matter what the result, it's still disturbing to see the FBI getting involved with some people who just wanted faster internet connections.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Ed Halley, Sep 26th, 2003 @ 10:11am

    This is where you wish you could retroactively point out a Class for class action-- why were all of these cases were judged and decided so inconsistently? Solely on the ability of the defendant to defend. Those convicted or who settled should (but likely won't) look to appeal.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: No Subject Given

    identicon
    anon, Sep 26th, 2003 @ 5:25pm

    "Those convicted or who settled should (but likely won't) look to appeal"

    I am sure the Settledment deal had it a clause thay would not let them sue the cable company ever again, even if the CEO came over and f'ed them in the ass, as they do every time they send you your cable bill

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This