RSS
Is Ignorance Bliss When It Comes To Creating Software?
from the why-not? dept
Hiawatha Bray, whose Boston Globe articles I usually like quite a bit, is making fun of the maker of file sharing software Morpheus for daring to claim that he doesn't want to know what his users are doing with their software. This is, of course, the legal argument that Morpheus (and Grokster and others) are using in their case against the RIAA. They say that they just create software, which has plenty of legitimate uses, so why should they be held accountable if people misuse it. Bray seems to think this is ridiculous, and suggests that these companies are lying. He's missing the point. There's a difference in not knowing what people are doing with the software and not being responsible for what people are doing with the software. It shouldn't matter whether or not the makers of such software know what people are using it for - the issue is whether or not the makers of the software are responsible for what's done with it. We don't blame Microsoft every time someone types up a ransom note or a bank robbery note in Word, so why should it be the fault of Morpheus any time someone downloads a song illegally?
4 Comments | Leave a Comment..
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
sue the record companies!
another bad thing is that most CDs prices are lowered within 3 to 6 months.
for just released CDs I recomand lowering the prices with 30%. downloading mp3 thru phone connections will be more more expensive, more time consuming and less quality.
another thing is do not give artists big payments in advance, but higher payments per sold CDs. they will make better music and will sell more!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Xerox
Has any copyright holder ever sued Xerox because someone made a photocopy of their work?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
Then they could use the argument that they just make it and don't dictate it's use.
It's mostly an analogy to the Gun manufacturers. There are a number of legit uses for firearms and therefore they fact they are used illegally for a number of other things can be squarely placed on the user, not the manufacturer.
IF you product is only being used to support illegal activities, you are going to lose in a court of law each and every time.
--RJD --
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment