Judges OK Evidence From Hacker Vigilante
from the fine-lines dept
An appeals court has ruled that the government can use evidence in a child porn case that was found by a vigilante hacker. The question was whether or not it was illegal search and seizure, and the appeals court panel ruled it wasn't (overturning a lower court). The court ruled that this wasn't illegal search and seizure because the search was done without prompting from the federal government, and they only found out about it afterwards. Of course, this is a fine line. Since you can now go to jail for life for malicious hacking, can the feds now turn around and charge the hacker? Or maybe he'll just get arrested by local authorities and the FBI hangs him out to dry.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Extremely dangerious prescident...
Everybody has something to hide (hence the right to privacy)... and some people don't even know that they have something to hide and/or that it is even illegal.
If you don't agree with me, feel free to post your SSN, credit card number and your mother's maiden name.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Damn stupid case - very stupid indeed
Very bad precedent and should be more carefully followed and examined. These sorts of things are very, very wrong indeed.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Damn stupid case - very stupid indeed
-- Grep
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Extremely dangerious prescident...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment