FBI Targets Net Phoning

from the got-hear-everything dept

Because the FBI can't handle the idea that someone somewhere might (gasp!) talk to someone else without the FBI being allowed to listen in, they're now looking to force ISPs to open up a way for them to tap voice over IP calls. Of course, if you can tap voice packets, you can tap data packets too. So, why don't we just make sure that all internet traffic routes its way through FBI servers, just to be safe? Next thing you know, they'll be requiring people to make photocopies of any written note and store it in a special locker that the FBI can access. After all, terrorists might contact each other by written note, and then where would we be?

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Just..

    identicon
    nil-ram, Jul 29th, 2003 @ 11:00am

    Just put it in the memory hole, bro, and take your Soma.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Better than the current system

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 29th, 2003 @ 1:00pm

    Canadian, British, and other foreign intelligence services are already listening in on American phone calls anyway. Under the current system, the NSA swaps Echelon intelligence for foreign intelligence, which rarely makes it all the way to the FBI.

    POTS calls are monitored by state and local police departments, which is then shared with the FBI, so the FBI rarely needs to initiate phone taps on its own. But for VoIP, local cops may not have the jurisdiction or sophistication.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Free Wold Dial-Up

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 29th, 2003 @ 4:54pm

    I'll opt-in when the first IPSEC enabled phones with decentralized public key stores begin to become available.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    XjjWSyqm9K

    identicon
    XjjWSyqm9K, Jul 5th, 2006 @ 1:09pm

    OhWX 80tBbAT EmjSQUy sj1c9aNRzS
    aQ5Xz
    4IJ0swvtfFY
    lZPi4
    tLzIz2kSk ZDwG3 hoRRaW9A eey2Z89zF9J1 koGNZGn WvRS8Jpf jgB8bcccBzU8
    QXVoHEks6B
    yQ3D706GHH
    FsXPXK
    xGE1h
    rSllMNE8IUd
    TUI7wFZ

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This