Legal Issues

Legal Issues

by Mike Masnick




Anti-Porn Bill Targets File Sharing

from the regulating-Kazaa dept

It appears that another part of the entertainment industry's strategy to kill file sharing networks is moving forward. After years of fear-mongering reports about people (gasp!) using file sharing networks to download porn, they've convinced some Congressional representatives to introduce a bill to regulate file sharing networks. It's called the Protecting Children from Peer-to-Peer Pornography Act, and would require any file sharing system to get "parental consent" before a child could use it - and would even let parents install a special "beacon" (designed by the FTC) that would alert parents if their kids installed file sharing software. There are a number of reasons why this is a ridiculous piece of legislation. Ignoring the (big) question of how you would go about building such a "beacon" in a way that would actually work, you also have to wonder how this could possibly be enforced. Furthermore, there's a ton of porn just on the Internet itself. Technically, someone could apply this bill to the entire internet (it is a file sharing network, there is porn available).

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Jul 27th, 2003 @ 6:59pm
  • Trojan horse...

    by Anonymous Coward

    ...the real purpose of the bill is to insure that P2P users are 18 years old... so they can be sued in civil court by the RIAA.

    Is anyone else getting tired of the "save the children" political ploy? ...or is it just me.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jul 27th, 2003 @ 11:27pm
  • This is great...

    by LittleW0lf

    I suggest 2 things...first, we need to fix the bill so that it will allow the shutdown (via beacon,) of certain internet clients (basically denying all internet, or peer-to-peer access.) Second, need to make sure that Congress, RIAA, and MPAA all appear on the list of machines automatically deactivated using the beacon.

    After all, wasn't an author trying to get AOL to lock up usenet a while back...it would be much more simple to just lock up his access, and he wouldn't know bad things were happening. Same with congress, lock up their computers and then they won't be spending all day, and out tax money, on simultaneously f**king up the internet and browsing porn (not that I care for the porn anyway, but I should be able to download music from an artists website without receiving cease and desist letters, or copying legitimate files without having some sort of congressional permission to do so.)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It