Don't Break E-Mail To Save It
from the solutions... dept
Vipul Prakash from Cloudmark is clearly a bit biased when it comes to anti-spam filtering methods - but he still makes some good points in an essay saying that we shouldn't break email to save it. He points out that most anti-spam solutions require some change that somehow "breaks" the way email should work, and suggests that there are three rules any email system should abide by: "(1) Ability to send and receive e-mail from a stranger. (Whitelisting, payment systems, and challenge/response break this rule.) (2) Ability to send and receive pseudo-anonymous e-mail. (Domain-based authentication breaks this rule.) (3) E-mail should be free. (Payment systems break this rule.)"
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Leaked Memo Confirms Apple, Nokia & RIM Gave Indian Gov't Backdoors
- VW Will Block BlackBerry Email When People Are Off Work. Isn't That When It's Most Useful?
- Former Tunisian Regime Goes Beyond Spying On Internet Traffic... To Rewriting Emails & More
- Email Is 40 Years Old
- New US Postal Service Ad Campaign: Email Sucks, So Mail Stuff Instead





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Nonsense, Email does not have to be free
- The Precision Blogger
precision-blogging.blogspot.com
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment