Expense Options--But Give Startups A Break
from the one-way-to-do-it dept
Business Week has an opinion piece that says one way to deal with the ongoing debate over expensing options is to make public companies expense options, but set up different rules for private companies. Some think this is a terrible idea, since it sets up a two-tier system. If it works one way for public companies, they say, it should work the same for private companies. Of course, there are some major differences, starting with the fact that, in private companies, there is no real market setting the option price. Furthermore, the argument in the article suggests that startups would be hurt unfairly if they needed to expense options. It would cause them to have much lower profits, since they still need to use options to lure top talent - but would harm them because it would make the companies appear less stable and less credible to potential customers. Of course, I'd still like to think that most people can understand the change in accounting rules doesn't actually change anyone's cash position in the slightest - and thus, can adjust on their own mental scale to measure what it all means.
- SEC Told Pandora To Be More Explicit In Its IPO That Its Business Is Likely Unsustainable Due To Crazy Licensing Rates
- The Fine Line Between Crowdfunding & An Illegal Securities Offering Part II: SEC Fines Ad Execs Over Pabst Stunt
- As Pandora Goes Public, How Come No One Is Pointing Out That It Misled The Press About Being Profitable?
- Don't Try To Make Sense Of LinkedIn Share Price
- DailyDirt: Start-up Pitches And Strikeouts...





Add Your Comment