RSS
Everyone Print Out All Your Emails For The Sake Of History
from the filing-nightmare dept
Just as we've finally reached the point where we're no longer hearing stories of senior executives at companies who have their assistants print out each of their emails, along come some researchers suggesting that everyone print out paper copies of their emails for the sake of history. He's afraid that digital data isn't permanent enough, and we're all going to lose important historical data. Now, some of his points are valid. The ease with which data is deleted is definitely true. Furthermore, changing formats, and incompatible hardware and software certainly has created situations where data has become difficult to retrieve. However, the nice thing about being digital is that it's easy to make exact replicas of the data, that can be backed up and stored in multiple formats and places. Paper isn't quite so easy (or cheap) to copy, and is also very susceptible to decay and other natural disasters like, say, fire. I'd say the ease of replication wins out long-term, over the hard-copy nature of paper, when it comes to keeping historical records.
10 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Leaked Memo Confirms Apple, Nokia & RIM Gave Indian Gov't Backdoors
- VW Will Block BlackBerry Email When People Are Off Work. Isn't That When It's Most Useful?
- Former Tunisian Regime Goes Beyond Spying On Internet Traffic... To Rewriting Emails & More
- Email Is 40 Years Old
- New US Postal Service Ad Campaign: Email Sucks, So Mail Stuff Instead
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
it's TOO easy to save stuff
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
digital vs paper
http://techdirt.com/articles/20030618/1646201.shtml
that digital wins out with respect to long-term storage. In a hundred years or more, the paper may have decayed, but it will still be readable, and instantly so… whereas digital formats come and go so fast….. I wouldn't count on CDs, DVDs and other medium to be readily accessible by then.
Then again, how many of us will be alive to bitch about it anyway. :)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
I'd say parchment is a different story. Unless you've got something going that I don't know about, I doubt your printing your email on parchment.
However, you've missed my point. I'm not saying paper doesn't last. I'm saying the benefits of data being digital far outweigh the benefits of paper lasting a long time.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Digital doesn't last either
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Digital doesn't last either
But, it's also much much easier to copy and backup.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Another journalistic missed target?
Anybody have a link to the original Nature story?
The archival aspect of digital data is an area which is extremely important, but almost entirely ignored by the mainstream media. One could suppose because all journalists rely on "backgrounder" data from either dead-tree or digital formats those sources are mostly downplayed because they are "old" news.
What's interesting is that digital media has the ability to provide all of us with much more of a useful and stable method of preserving our history than ever before. That we don't seem to have the method of doing that very well yet is a result of digital being a very young medium.
Frankly, my email doesn't nearly approach the level of Friedberg's and I can safely dump more than 90 percent with few qualms.
On the other hand, I wonder how many of us non-Friedbergs have potentially valuable family photos tucked away in a drawer now fading away. You may not care about those photos, but your children or their children might.
A few years ago there was a mini crisis in Hollywood about the fact that a bunch of old films were self-destructing because of time, poor storage, and the type of film emulsion. What's sad about what may have been lost is the genesis of some of the roots of motion-picture technology.
Here's an irony. Some of the oldest books around for historical research were printed on vellum which was originally a tanned skin of a calf or lamb. The technology of how they made that media to last so long is now mostly speculation. There are other examples of "old" tech which have become lost.
Sorry for the rant,
Perry
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Changing E-mail format?
What kind of internet is this guy using? The one I use has had the same email format since inception. You know, that same internet whose open formats directly led to its widespread use. The 'mbox' format hasn't changed since, well, ever, really.
And when, really, is it going to be changed? When DRM becomes mandatory? I think that, if that happens, we have more problems than we think.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Changing E-mail format?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: digital vs paper
ASCII has been around a long time... and the ascidic papers that are in production today have the life span of a papertowl comparied to various papers of the past.
Here's a simple test: show me a printout from the 50s or 60s (and I don't mean a punch card).
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment