Will Waste Push File-Sharing Further Underground?

from the or-is-it-just-a-waste-of-time dept

People definitely seem to have very mixed opinions on Waste, the Justin Frankel/Nullsoft program that was only available for a few hours before AOL yanked it and told everyone they needed to delete their copies. Most of the early press reports on the subject didn't really understand what it was, and assumed it was just a new file sharing system to compete with Kazaa or even the various Gnutella clients (Frankel also created Gnutella). This MIT Technology Review article is the first one I've seen that tries to understand what the program is really designed for - encrypted collaboration within small groups - and see where it might lead. Since the source code was released under GPL, no matter how hard AOL tries, they're not going to bring it back under wraps. However, it will be interesting to see if people take the code and do anything interesting with it. The majority opinion that I've heard is that it's an interesting base to start from - but needs a lot of work to build a useful application on top of it. While it is possible that it will be used for encrypted "hidden" file sharing, there is much more to this application than that - and that's way too narrow a way to look at it.

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    GPL SchmeePL

    identicon
    Faisal, Jun 11th, 2003 @ 6:44pm

    If the person who released it under GPL was not authorized to do so, AOL may be able to shut down distribution of it or at least successfully sue anyone who does.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: GPL SchmeePL

    icon
    Mike (profile), Jun 11th, 2003 @ 7:27pm

    Yeah, but how do you shut down distribution when it's done randomly by anyone who has the code?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Super Pimp, Jun 11th, 2003 @ 10:14pm

    I think people are in a tizzy over nothing. It seems in many ways comparable to products by IBM and Microsoft in the corporate messaging arena. All this talk of file sharing is stupid. That's obviously not the purpose of this program.
    But it did get me wondering...
    If BMG could be held responsible for Napster. Could one hold AOL responsible for GNUtella?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Re: No Subject Given

    identicon
    Csharpener, Jun 12th, 2003 @ 2:15pm

    By that logic you could call AIM a file sharing client, as it does have file sharing features.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This