A Mathematician Plays The Stock Market

from the not-everything-is-math dept

I've never been a big fan of the so-called "technical analysis" method of investing in the stock market, since it seemed to have a huge fatal flaw: it was all based on past events which might have absolutely no bearing on the future. It's the nature of independent events. However, many people do believe in it, as well as many other "mathematical" methods for predicting the latest turn in the stock market. The San Jose Mercury News has an interview with a math professor discussing some of these methods and the people who get caught up in them in his new book, A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market. Not that the professor feels high-and-mighty about these things, because he fell for a lot of them just as hard (if not worse!) during the boom and bust. The interview does point out the one thing that I think is the most useful "trick" in trying to predict the stock market. You have to realize that you're not really trying to predict the values of the underlying companies - but you're trying to predict what everyone else in the market is going to do. For that matter alone, you shouldn't necessarily ignore something like "technical analysis" just because it, by itself, is basically useless. The fact that so many investors do use it, means that it's useful in understanding how they're going to invest - which is useful knowledge.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Flawed flaw

    identicon
    Doug, Jun 9th, 2003 @ 12:48pm

    [technical analysis] seemed to have a huge fatal flaw: it was all based on past events which might have absolutely no bearing on the future. It's the nature of independent events.
    The flaw in the flaw is that stock prices are not at all independent of prior values; they have a very high auto-correlation. And it's not just the prices themselves that have auto-correlation, it's pricing trends.

    I'm not well-versed in technical analysis, but from what I can tell it mainly is looking for indications that the pricing, and price trends, of a stock are being influenced by something other than auto-correlation.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    technical analysis

    identicon
    farouk, Sep 30th, 2008 @ 4:59am

    i believe technical analysis is important for determining the timing for buying a stock but not the stock itself, for example if i found that its a good opportunity to buy coca cola then i would then check the technical charts to find the right timing

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This