RSS
Twitter
Hey SCO, Sue Me!
from the sue-me!--sue-me! dept
As SCO continues with their ridiculous plan to antagonize everyone they can possibly think of, some Linux-geeks have come up with an amusing way to protest. They're putting together a petition of Linux users, and telling SCO to go ahead and sue them. Earlier this week, of course, SCO made a lot of news for sending letters to large Linux-using corporations telling them they're liable for any intellectual property infringement in the copies of Linux they use. The petition states, in response, "I am a Linux user. I feel that SCO's tactics toward an operating system of my choice are unjust, ill founded and bizarre. I am willing to be sued because I am confident that SCO's tactics toward Linux will fail. If I have published my email address as part of this petition it is so SCO representatives can email me and begin the process of serving me a court order." Feel free to sign the petition yourself.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
What if
Mike,
What is SCO's right? What if *gasp* IBM actually *did* do something really bad? What if, shock of shocks, the 800-lb gorilla forgot it needed to act responsibly for once?
Probably you will just try to forget about it. After all, writing something not-negative about SCO is apparently not permitted.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: What if
Okay, you seem to have mistaken me for someone else. I'm the first person around here to admit when I'm wrong. However, this is pretty clearly a bullshit claim. It's not so much the IBM suit that bothers me (you seem to have forgotten that I didn't spend much time when SCO first announced the suit against IBM), but the fact that they've announced plans to go after *everyone*.
Besides, I'm pretty consistently against any kind of software patents around here. I think it's a bad business model, and it does more harm for *your own* market.
Besides, SCO was selling their own version of Linux, so they've pretty much killed any claim on that one.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: What if
pretty clearly a bullshit claim
What makes it a 'bullshit claim'?
GNU/Linux has more than one occurance of taking others code, removing copywrite info, and putting a GPL on the code.
What SCO doesn't get is if they win, people will just move in-mass off of GNU/Linux to BSD. Yea! SCO wins an empty bag! And BSD, having settled matters years ago, would be even a BIGGER fight for SCO.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: What if
I am aware that some code that was released under the Berkeley copyright has been integrated into GNU code but in those cases I believe the Berkeley rules were also followed (by preserving the notice in the source along with the GPL). Is there any other case?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
No Subject Given
I think we should sue SCO for anti competitive practices, and make it a class action suit. Or, we should patent the proccess or suing IBM, and sue SCO for breach of patent.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: What if
Case 1) 2.0.X version. A headder file explicity states they REMOVED the BSD copyright.
Case 2) ATA Raid code. Seee /. for an example.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: What if
Uh oh, someone said something negative about linux. Shouldn't there be a protest or something being planned? Shouldn't someone be DDOSing his server?
More linux, more whining. Surprise, surprise.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: What if
GNU/Linux has more than one occurance of taking others code, removing copywrite info, and putting a GPL on the code.
Care to provide some examples?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: What if
Care to provide some examples?
I've already said 2. But you must be:
1) So uneducated about GNU/Linux and BSD, you don't know where to work
2) A troll
3) To lazy to go look them up.
In the interest of educating you:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/24/1432223&mode=thread
You can pay me for my time to go back thru the 2.0.X series to find the 'remove the BSD copyright' file.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment