RSS
Happiness Is A Used PC
from the hang-on-to-that-PC dept
Another topic that keeps coming up over the past two years or so is whether or not the upgrade cycle for PCs has been "stretched". It used to be that most people would replace a computer every three years or so. Now, people seem to be hanging onto old machines much longer. There are a few reasons for this. Most important, of course, is that (for the most part) applications that require more power just aren't that big a deal any more. Most people use their PCs for web-surfing and email, and maybe a little word processing. Just about any old computer can handle that now. While there may be new apps coming along that require more power, so far they haven't been all that convincing for the general population.
8 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Why Apple Will Not Be Part Of The Real Tablet Revolution
- DailyDirt: We've Got The Droids You're Looking For...
- DailyDirt: No 9000 Computer Has Ever Made A Mistake Or Distorted Information...
- State Department Spent $1.2 Billion On An Asset Monitoring System... That Ignores All Non-Windows Equipment
- Feds Say They Can Search Bradley Manning's Friend's Laptop Because They Can
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
No Subject Given
And yeah, there's been no cool apps in a while.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
old PCs are awesome
My last "treat" was an Athlon T-bird 21/2 years ago...its maxed on RAM and HD space and vid card...It'll run great for years!
My laptop is used...a P333 with DVD drive...and running linux its as fast (or faster at times) than my 1.5Gig at work running windows 2000.
I like to tinker and I've gathered several PCs, a P233, a P166, a P133 and 7 P90s, lots of RAM, hard drives...all for basically nothing...Just looking for companies throwing this stuff away...and they are run quite well for basic computing tasks like file-serving (at home on my network) basic email, browsing, music and stuff like that.
When you consider that recent versions of Linux will run VERY well on older hardware...this stuff becomes GOLD! And I have spent maybe less than 50 bucks in the last year on all this stuff...many used PC places allow trades for missing parts (ie: I've traded extra HDs for ram or network cards etc...)
The only time I find I really NEED a big PC is when I play games...and even then...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Here's the REAL reason
Users WANT new machines, but cannot for the life of them justify the time required to reinstall and reconfigure EVERYTHING.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Hardware upgrades are often a big waste of money.
Does it really matter to the average user that it takes an office document 5 seconds to load on an older machine, where it might take half a second or less on a newer, faster one? Is this 4 and a half seconds really worth 12 to 16 hundred dollars a new middle of the curve machine represents?
I recently bought a new computer. It’s Dell 600sc server. (Heck of a deal at the time at 401 Canadian dollars.) It sits in the hall closet and serves my website. The interesting offshoot of this is that by getting this machine, I was able to use it to prop up my ancient but still perfectly capable NEC P-2200 (pent 200), the machine I use daily for email, web page building and surfing. It also allowed me to buy a cheap second hand IBM P-II for 75 dollars, to use to offer my streaming audio channel on Shoutcast. All the audio files are stored on the Dell of course.
It seems to me, that unless you are an avid gamer, or really like watching DVD movies on your machine, It doesn’t make much sense to rush out every year or so to buy the latest and greatest. If one spends the money with a little attention the sum of the parts can indeed exceed the worth of the individual totals.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
turnover
But the points made by posters are good ones.
I suspect that many who won't relapce desktop machines are opting for notebooks.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Here's the REAL reason
Come on. Agreed that Bill needs to provide that feature. But 90% of PC users are aloof and have no clue what's installed, what works and what doesn't, or how they will migrate to the new machine. They will take the most recent 10 files they worked on (this year's stuff) and use a floppy to copy it to the new machine. The rest they will just forget about, and complain to their friends and coworkers "I used to have that file, but it's on my old machine".
Very few of us worry about the time or effort involved for switching machines.
Most users, even after using their boxes for years, still have the original factory advertisement program icons (Free! AOL) on their desktops.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Denial is the First Step
I didn't realize I was a neo-ludite until I noticed I was browsing the web and reading my e-mail on a 1997 vintage PI MMX HP Vectra.
So, I then upgraded to a Via Mini-ITX C3 800mhz unit and was able to read my e-mail and browse the web at exactly the same speed. It's amazing just how far technology can come in 5 years...
After another 7 years or so, I think I'll upgrade to Transmeta's latest processor (if they're still around). I'm pretty sure this will maintain my backwards speed compatability requirements.
I'm almost to the point where the number of gigabytes exceeds the number of megahertz. When that happens, I'll probably reduce my upgrade cycle to once every 10 years.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hardware upgrades are often a big waste of mon
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment