Justices Caught In A Web Over Web Jurisdiction

from the where-can-we-sue? dept

The issue of jurisdiction concerning lawsuits that involve online content keeps coming up again and again. There was the question of where Kazaa could be sued, whether or not Tim Koogle was responsible for Yahoo content in the US that violated French law, whether the Australian Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a news article posted in the US and whether the US has the right to imprison those who write software outside of this country that violates (bad) laws inside the country. With all these questions being raised, you would think the US Supreme Court might want to set down an official US precedent on the matter - so that (at least in the US) we knew what we were dealing with. However, the Supreme Court has decided to take a pass on the issue of online jurisdicition, meaning that we're sure to see plenty more cases before we know where anyone can be sued.

1 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 29th, 2003 @ 6:33am

    That's about the size of it.
    It's like the tax moritorium. They want to see what will happen.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This