Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   Why?

   

   JD, Apr 8th, 2003 @ 5:51pm

   
   

   Why do the libraries feel obligated to do any more than follow the law? You're in a public place, using public equipment. It's no different than picking your nose at McDonalds over that Big Mac. Somebody is liable to see you; but you're in public!
   
   It is not the libraries job to circumvent the law; just abide by it. It is *your* choice if you want to avail yourself of public services, but you cannot reasonably expect the same amount of privacy as if you were at home in your closet. (I understand that there really is not that much more privacy there either...)
   
   The United States is slowly being eaten alive from within.
   

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Re: Why?

   

   Sofa King Stoned, Apr 9th, 2003 @ 8:40am

   
   

   Assuming you are not a troll, your analogy is flawed. Picking your nose in a public restaurant may subject you to ridicule for your (lack of) higene, but a list of books you have read, or websites you have visited has the potential for far greater abuse than simple embarrasment at being caught picking your nose. What if your spouse found out you had checked out "Divorce for Dummies," or if the IRS knew you had been reading up on "Tax Shelters for Dummies?" Also, just because a place is publicly accessible, doesn't mean you expect everything you do to be available for scrutiny to any curious parties. You would not expect any random person to be able to approach the McD's cashier and get an itemized list of what you bought, at what time and how you paid for it, over the last three months and whether you like extra cheese (against your doctor's orders) would you?
   Besides, more information does not mean better information. As far as we know established terrorist protocol is to conduct all exchanges of material information via face-to-face meetings or via blind drops, not via library facilities. Our HSA would better spend it's time securing vulnerable targets rather than pouring over library receipts for Ossama.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Re: Why?

   

   thecaptain, Apr 9th, 2003 @ 11:07am

   
   

   I agree with you and wanted to add another point to feed the troll.
   
   Beyond collecting information about you (which is bad enough) the big fear is the possible misinterpretation of that information.
   
   You aren't necessarily a terrorist because you read certain book, but someone will likely ASSUME you are eventually when they profile you.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Re: Why?

   

   IS Doctor, Apr 10th, 2003 @ 11:57am

   
   

   It's simple - the facilities are being paid for by public dollars in a public place....you have no reasonable expectation of privacy...period. Regarding what HSA should be doing, it is public knowledge that they used library computers in the execution of 911, so why not keep an eye on them? An are you putting yourself forward as an expert on terrorist activity? I would prefer to leave it to people who are paid to know. After 911, yeah, I want to know who is using public facilities. If that keeps you and your buddies from whatever perversive or subversive activities that you fear will somehow be exposed to the light of day by this purported loss of "privacy" (which most of you happily abrogate for $1.00 off coupon to McDonalds), I can live happily with that.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment