Making Senders Pay The Price For Spam

from the this-again dept

We've had articles about setting up systems to make people "pay" to send emails before as a way to stamp out spam, but now IBM is on the case. They've worked out an idea that they think would prevent spammers from sending too many emails. It works by requiring any email sender to pay a small fee to receive an authorization code to send emails to certain addresses. The receiver can put anyone they want on a whitelist, which will exempt them from having to pay. Otherwise, the sender would need to get the authorization code first. It's an interesting plan, but like all such plans would (1) require a massive change in email infrastructure (2) require a massive change in the way people think about and use email and (3) actively discourage some of the nicer aspects of email. Spam is a huge problem that I complain about all the time - but I'm not convinced the "charge for it" solution is a practical one either.

3 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Coincidence perhaps?

    identicon
    aust_cat, Mar 20th, 2003 @ 5:06pm

    Robert X. Cringely wrote about this a week ago.

    Is it just a co-incidence.

    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030313.html

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    Michael M, Mar 21st, 2003 @ 12:03am

    I'm curious about that too, it looks like the same idea. (Not a new idea, in either case, and it will never work.) Here's my response to Cringely's nickel-a-message idea.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Social rules

    identicon
    alternatives, Mar 21st, 2003 @ 7:15am

    "If we change the social rules of E-mail just a tiny bit, I think the whole problem of spam goes away."

    That would be the social rule that stops one from hitting the spammer with a baseball bat?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This