The NY Times is impressed that all the various major music labels and major online music sites have more or less agreed on pricing, for the time being. What they're forgetting is that the consumers haven't agreed on such pricing (remember, the market sets the price...), and thus, they're happy to stick with their free alternatives. I'm surprised, though, to see a music label exec (from Warner Music) admit in the article that, "at the end of the day we will invite people to listen without charging an admission fee." It's good that they realize that - but it would be nicer if they were actually working on real business models around the idea that the music itself can be free.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Rep. Peter King's Office Suggests NPR Producer Lied About Being Detained At Border By DHS
- USTR Says TPP Must Be Kept Secret, Because The Public Is Too Stupid To Understand It
- DailyDirt: Technology Is Changing The Way We Talk Because Internetz, LOL
- Joe Biden Tells Chinese Citizens To 'Challenge The Government,' Neglects To Mention His Administration Doesn't Like Being Challenged
- Holy See (The Pope) Criticizes TPP And TAFTA/TTIP In WTO Speech