News You Could Do Without

News You Could Do Without

by Mike Masnick




A Nickel Here, A Buck There Add Up To Big Phone Bills

from the fleecing-the-public dept

Not that this will surprise many people, but the Baby Bells have been steadily raising all the "fees" they charge for all those add-on services they got you hooked on with cheap promotional deals. Personally, I wouldn't have a problem with them doing so, if they were clear about it. Instead, like always, they make sure to hide the info in the middle of their insanely confusing bills. I would think that this is an opportunity for VoIP companies like Vonage to show up and point out to everyone why they're better. The Bells may have pushed out competition on their local lines through shrewd politics and sheer stubbornness, but competition will simply make an end-run around them.

8 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Feb 28th, 2003 @ 6:06am
  • No Subject Given

    Not everything in telecom is bad. Witness Verizon Veriations, which gives customers all the services they could want for a flat fee (I just signed up myself). If only there weren't $109 in taxes on a $60 phone bill.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Feb 28th, 2003 @ 11:36am
  • Verizon's

    by X-addict

    Verizon charges $7 per month for their caller-id service.. While its nice to have caller-id, that price bites and I have a hard time believing that they need to charge that price to cover the equipment costs.. In my case, I called Verizon about a week ago and disabled caller-id, inside wiring plan, unlisted phone number and switched from unlimited local to measured service and removed close to $20 from my phone bill.. now if the feds would quit raising the required subscriber line charges (currently $6), that would be nice as well..

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Feb 28th, 2003 @ 11:50am
  • vonage rocks

    by Dr_Stein

    Vonage really does rock. Better services from SBC and a much lower price.

    Having Canada *not* treated as an international call is also VERY cool.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Feb 28th, 2003 @ 12:06pm
  • No Subject Given

    by u2604ab

    Pac-Bell (now SBC) pissed me off 3 years ago. I bought a cell phone and haven't had a land line since then. The Baby Bells and the music companies have something in common: refusal to compete and innovate.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Feb 28th, 2003 @ 1:44pm
  • The new charges that are coming

    by aReader

    Following new charges are on way:
    1) Fee to "look" at your phone
    2) Fee to receive the phone without actually picking up the phone
    3) 'Smile Surcharge' -- a fee charged based on number of times you smile while talking
    4) Receiver portability fee -- your SBC phone will no longer work on a receiver that you used for AT & T

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It