In yet another example of just how ridiculous the DMCA law is, Lexmark has won an injunction to stop a company from selling inkjet cartridges that work in their printers. While the DMCA was originally meant to protect music from being copied online, it's now being used for ridiculous cases such as this - where Lexmark is saying it's illegal for another company to offer a competing inkjet cartridge because it has to "circumvent" their encryption. Of course, based on the wording of the law, this injunction is probably "correct". The problem is that the law is awful. If Lexmark is successful, and the law isn't changed, it means that we may be faced with a world where you won't be allowed to modify anything you own. Ownership is becoming less clear than it used to be. Soon, everything you own could actually be "licensed" to you instead.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Unarmed Man Charged With Assault Because NYC Police Shot At Him And Hit Random Pedestrians
- Judge In No Fly Case Explains To DOJ That It Can't Claim Publicly Released Info Is Secret
- German Court Says CEO Of Open Source Company Liable For 'Illegal' Functions Submitted By Community
- More Schools Reconsidering Zero Tolerance Policies And On-Campus Law Enforcement
- Case Over No-Fly List Takes Bizarre Turn As Gov't Puts Witness On List, Then Denies Having Done So