Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   This is funny..

   

   Richard Jones, Feb 27th, 2003 @ 5:04pm

   
   

   I read an article just last week that said that print photography wasn't going anywhere. Sure, there's some migration from print to digital, but it's nothing even close to being the death of print. I suspect the PMAI may have a vested interest in spinning the story this way...
   
   Anyway: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/02/21/1045638480193.html
   
   IMHO, the quality of mid-price-range digital cameras still have nothing on that of print cameras. Most photo labs offer a film scanning service for next to nothing. And cheap digital cameras are just not worth buying, they're so terrible. I'll still be using print until the mid-price-range digital cameras can come close to the quality of print.
   

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Re: This is funny..

   

   Duffman, Feb 28th, 2003 @ 7:53am

   
   

   I still use my old point-and-click camera. I prefer using it, actually. For me (and a lot of amateur and professional photographers), there's something missing in a digital camera. On the other hand, there are those who exclusively use a digital camera. I myself have taken beautiful photos with both, and I wouldn't give either up, and while I would say the point-and-click camera market is thriving, it is far from dead, or even dying.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment