Buyer Sues eBay For Alleged Online Slander
from the get-over-it dept
Okay, let's try this one more time for the slow people... If you are providing an internet service that lets anyone comment on things, then those comments are the responsibility of the people who wrote them, and not the company providing the online site. Some guy is suing eBay for slander because someone gave him bad feedback over an auction. The guy who is suing is a lawyer (big surprise there) and has some odd things in the lawsuit. First, he's suing both eBay and the guy who made the negative comments, though he's asking for $2.5 million from eBay and only $100,000 from the guy. Next, he seems to claim that because he told eBay to remove the comments, and they refused, they somehow broke the law. But, his description of what law they broke is that they were "arrogant". I had no idea that arrogance was illegal these days. Furthermore, in the lawsuit he says eBay should be forced to filter the following words from their feedback site: "fraud, liar, cheater, scam artist, con man." Finally, in the most bizarre part of the lawsuit, he says that anyone selling anything on eBay should be required to register their screen names with the state of California as fictitious business names (a standard requirement for anyone acting as a business under a name other than their own), and that eBay be forced to collect state sales tax. What this has to do with the actual case is anybody's guess.
9 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
- White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
I'm suing techdirt
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
It's a curious and sometimes mystifying system. In any case, their system of leaving negatives/positives doesn't really work. Even honest sellers/buyers are often too scared to leave ANY negatives, because they know they are bound to get one in return.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm suing techdirt
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm suing techdirt
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm suing techdirt
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm suing techdirt by love trux
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Ebayer sues Ebay for alledge online slander
The EBayer who made the liabelous statement is at fault directly for making the statement, and publishing it on the EBay feedback. While free speach is protected in this country no person has the right to go beyond an opinion and make absolute charges such as "fraud, liar, cheater, scam artist, con man, which is a criminal matter.
Especially if that person is a lawyer and his reputation is at state as a lawyer for such an outburst of discriptives.
Everyone in this country is treated innocent until proven guitly in a court of law. In this case there was no trial to back up this EBayer's statement. If the EBayer who is being sued by this lawyer picks up a case from the Web that shows the lawyer was convicted for fraud, then the statement made on EBay would be true and not liabelous. However, this is hardly ever the case now is it? No one can be a Judge, Jury, and executioner all in one. Therefore whoever stated such a thing stated it to a lawyer and, that lawyer believe me knows what he's talking about!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Ebay is allowing Liable / Online Slander - Lawyer is Right
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Ebay is allowing Liable / Online Slander - Lawyer is Right
Promptly the item was refunded and a message immediately sent informing that the money was being refunded that minute, the auction was not ended one hour before the money was refunded and the apology sent to the customer, next day the customer put a vindictive comment and negative feedback.
My trading name on Ebay is the same as my Limited company name .
I now say this is slanderous and printed libel, and because as a web designer and software producer, I know this is forced on the search engines and each time anyone views my companies name online with this defamation and bright red negative feedback on the top of my list.
I say this is direct harassment also against criminal law, as I feel alarmed and distressed by this matter and it is not able to be ended, Ebay point blank refuse to remove the Negative feedback and derogative remarks, the customer is equally as abhorrent in their ignorance of my being upset.
Internet name systems Icann allows the issue of web names on the understanding you do not abuse them or harass people, slander or defame /libel them, I intend to contact them , I will also see what legal measures I can take for my company both in civil (Libel/Defamation) and criminal (!997 Harassment act).
I feel Ebay are becoming very biased in favour of buyers allowing them a free reign to abuse and harass.
This goes much further than freedom of speech and opinion, when it effects good standing of people and established reputable companies.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment