Comcast, AT&T Broadband Merger Official
from the now,-explain-to-me-how-this-is-different-from-EchoStar,-DirecTV dept
Okay, maybe I'm a little bit slow on this one, but now that the AT&T Broadband, Comcast merger has been approved by the FCC, I'm curious as to how that deal is any different than EchoStar's attempt to buy DirecTV? The FCC says that the "harm" will be negligible, and the increased scale will let them roll out services faster. Wouldn't the same be true of a combined EchoStar/DirecTV? The reasoning on killing the EchoStar/DirecTV deal was that it would create a monopoly in satellite TV. Well, now there's a monopoly in cable access. Of course, I think that the two sides (cable and satellite) clearly compete against each other, so there really isn't a monopoly issue. I'm just wondering why the FCC is being inconsistent?
1 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- DailyDirt: Coins Worth More Than Gold
- Surprise! AT&T Admits Defeat, Withdraws T-Mobile Takeover Attempt, Pays $4 Billion Breakup Fee
- DailyDirt: On The Way, The Paper Bag Was On My Knee...
- Hulu's Owners Unable To Find Idiots Willing To Overpay To Take Hulu Off Their Hands Before They Kill It
- Merger Of The Also Rans: Rhapsody Buys Napster





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Different the the Satellite Merger
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment