P2P Stars Trade Up To New Gigs
from the this-is-news? dept
News.com seems fascinated that two people who helped create P2P networks have gone on to create companies that are actually designed to make money. What I'm wondering is why is this a story? Did anyone think that either of these guys didn't plan to make money at some point in their lives? However, more importantly, neither of these ideas seems that impressive. One is simply a corporate structure so the guy can play around with various technologies he wants to explore. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but it's not exactly a business model that inspires confidence. The other reads like the description of a bubble company. It's a company founded by a 22 year old kid who's main credit is that he co-founded a company that never made a dime and is now out of business. It's received millions of dollars from big name VCs for producing what appears to be a me-too feature with lots of competition that is likely to have only marginal demand - and no clear business model.
- Cybersecurity Bill Backers Insist This Isn't SOPA... But Is It Needed?
- If The RIAA Wants To Talk About Misinformation Campaigns, Let's Start With The RIAA's Misinformation Campaign
- UK Report Blames The Internet For Terrorism, Says ISPs Should Take Down Content
- NY Times: RIAA & MPAA Exaggerate Piracy Impact Stats... But We're Going To Assume They're True Anyway
- Author Jonathan Franzen Thinks That Ebooks Mean The World Will No Longer Work





Add Your Comment